1995
DOI: 10.1080/07438149509354198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Growth ofVallisneria americanaMichx. in Relation to Sediment Nutrient Availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary nutrient source for Vallisneria is typically the sediment (Barko and Smart, 1981), and concentrations of surface water ammonium were low, suggesting that Vallisneria did absorb most ammonium through its roots. In a nutrient availability study, Rogers et al (1995) determined that at extractable concentrations of 11 mg nitrogen/g dry weight of sediment, nitrogen is potentially limiting to Vallisneria growth in the UMR. In our study, the average extractable ammonium concentration was 38.58 mg N/g dry weight sediment, indicating current ammonium concentrations were not limiting growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary nutrient source for Vallisneria is typically the sediment (Barko and Smart, 1981), and concentrations of surface water ammonium were low, suggesting that Vallisneria did absorb most ammonium through its roots. In a nutrient availability study, Rogers et al (1995) determined that at extractable concentrations of 11 mg nitrogen/g dry weight of sediment, nitrogen is potentially limiting to Vallisneria growth in the UMR. In our study, the average extractable ammonium concentration was 38.58 mg N/g dry weight sediment, indicating current ammonium concentrations were not limiting growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, survival was significantly higher and bud production was restricted to the 9% and 25% light treatments. Rogers et al (1995) suggest that Vallisneria growth on intrinsically infertile sediments in the UMR may depend on a continuous nitrogen supply from the sediment and the conditions in Lake Onalaska (1992) were suitable for Vallisneria restoration. Korschgen et al (1997) applied results of a culture study to Pool 8 of the UMR and suggested that irradiance might indeed limit the distribution and abundance of Vallisneria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is due to the scarcity of some elements that tend to precipitate in the more oxygenated water column (Barko et al, 1991), and to competition with phytoplanktonic populations that are very efficient in nutrient stripping (Pedersen, 1994). Thus, even if the submerged and rooted plants can absorb minerals over the leaf surfaces (Eugelink, 1998) for nutrients they rely essentially on the sediment that encloses their roots (Rogers et al, 1995., Barko andJames, 1998) and that becomes the main source for nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, manganese, microelements, and trace metals (Jackson et al, 1994a,b;Titus and Andorfer, 1996). Some rooted aquatic plants release organic compounds into sediment through their roots and this, coupled with the oxygen loss, leads to an increase in aerobic microbial biomass and activity, which enhances mineralization and improves availability of nutrients (Risgaard-Petersen and Jensen, 1997;Karjalainen et al, 2001).…”
Section: Mineral Nutrient Uptake and Deliverymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Each of these extreme events have occurred in recent UMRS history; a severe drought from 1987 to 1989 (Kimber et al, 1995a, b;Rogers et al, 1995b;Rogers & Theiling, 1999) and the ''Great Flood'' of 1993 (Theiling, 1999). During the drought, a loss of SAV was documented in Pools 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, and 19 (Rogers, 1994).…”
Section: Droughts and Floodsmentioning
confidence: 97%