Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1177/1077801214545284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Green Dot Bystander Intervention to Reduce Interpersonal Violence Among College Students Across Three Campuses

Abstract: Evidence suggests that interventions to engage bystanders in violence prevention increase bystander intentions and efficacy to intervene, yet the impact of such programs on violence remains unknown. This study compared rates of violence by type among undergraduate students attending a college campus with the Green Dot bystander intervention (n = 2,768) with students at two colleges without bystander programs (n = 4,258). Violent victimization rates were significantly (p < .01) lower among students attending th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
197
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
197
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Bullying is a group phenomenon and we know from previous research that bystanders play a crucial role in maintaining or limiting the level of bullying in school (Salmivalli, Poskiparta, Strohmeier, & Noam, 2012). Bystander intervention has also been useful for other areas of violence (Coker et al, 2014; Jouriles et al, 2015)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullying is a group phenomenon and we know from previous research that bystanders play a crucial role in maintaining or limiting the level of bullying in school (Salmivalli, Poskiparta, Strohmeier, & Noam, 2012). Bystander intervention has also been useful for other areas of violence (Coker et al, 2014; Jouriles et al, 2015)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reflected by both legal and funding requirements in the US (Coker et al, 2014;DeGue, 2014). Whilst specific programs such as 'Bringing in the Bystander' (e.g.…”
Section: The Evidence Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently across the various models, communities with higher levels of engagement (e.g., trust that the system will work) had more young adults who reported bystander action and interventions (Coker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Bystander Intervention Programsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The Green Dot program involves both a motivational speech by key leadership as well as a 4-6 hour curriculum delivered by peer opinion leaders. Initial evaluation results indicate that both victimization and perpetration rates were lower among college students attending the campuses that received the Green Dot intervention (Coker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Bringing In the Bystandersmentioning
confidence: 99%