2022
DOI: 10.1080/2372966x.2022.2067736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Good Behavior Game Using ClassDojo in Secondary Classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the results align with the findings of Bohan et al (2021) and with previous research demonstrating the efficacy of group contingencies in general (Maggin et al, 2012, 2017), and the CBGG specifically, in targeting classroom-based behavior (e.g., Ford, 2017; Tanol et al, 2010; Wahl et al, 2016; Wright & McCurdy, 2012). The findings lend further support to the efficacy of the CBGG with delayed feedback (e.g., Wahl et al, 2016) and immediate visual feedback (e.g., Lynne et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Taken together, the results align with the findings of Bohan et al (2021) and with previous research demonstrating the efficacy of group contingencies in general (Maggin et al, 2012, 2017), and the CBGG specifically, in targeting classroom-based behavior (e.g., Ford, 2017; Tanol et al, 2010; Wahl et al, 2016; Wright & McCurdy, 2012). The findings lend further support to the efficacy of the CBGG with delayed feedback (e.g., Wahl et al, 2016) and immediate visual feedback (e.g., Lynne et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This may be useful for teachers who are under time pressure and do not have time in their schedules to engage with more intensive behavior support plans and individualized classroom management. Although the CBGG has been evaluated with adolescent students before, previous versions have incorporated ClassDojo technology (e.g., Dadakhodjaeva, 2017; Ford, 2017). The version applied here used a simpler, low-tech method of awarding points, which may be more desirable for use by teachers in secondary school classrooms who have limited time frames in which to carry out class duties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations