2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the freezing–thawing effect in sand–silt mixtures using elastic waves and electrical resistivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory measurements of saline silty and sandy sediment, similar in grain size distribution to those at Muostakh Island, show that ice is present in the sediment for bulk resistivities over 10 m , although the boundary between ice-free and ice-bonded sediment may not be sharply defined, so that resistivity changes gradually with depth. We consider that any sand-silt mixture that is ice-bonded with fresh porewater, as is the case here based on the porewater concentrations from the drilling samples, and consistent with previous observations of submarine permafrost in the Laptev Sea, will have a resistivity not lower than 10 m, and probably higher than 100 m. This assumption is also based on laboratory measurements of bulk resistivity as a function of temperature and salinity for marine sediments which show that the change in bulk sediment resistivity from an unfrozen seawater-saturated sediment to a frozen ice-saturated sediment corresponds to a jump in resistivity from less than 10 to over 100 m (Frolov, 1998;King et al, 1988;Overduin et al, 2012). Uncertainties in IBP depth estimated from resistivity profiles thus correspond to the depth range of the bulk sediment resistivity increase from 10 to 100 m. Mean submarine permafrost degradation rate was calculated as the quotient of the depth to IBP (z pf ) and the time of erosion (t 0 ; time of inundation).…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity and Time Of Inundationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Laboratory measurements of saline silty and sandy sediment, similar in grain size distribution to those at Muostakh Island, show that ice is present in the sediment for bulk resistivities over 10 m , although the boundary between ice-free and ice-bonded sediment may not be sharply defined, so that resistivity changes gradually with depth. We consider that any sand-silt mixture that is ice-bonded with fresh porewater, as is the case here based on the porewater concentrations from the drilling samples, and consistent with previous observations of submarine permafrost in the Laptev Sea, will have a resistivity not lower than 10 m, and probably higher than 100 m. This assumption is also based on laboratory measurements of bulk resistivity as a function of temperature and salinity for marine sediments which show that the change in bulk sediment resistivity from an unfrozen seawater-saturated sediment to a frozen ice-saturated sediment corresponds to a jump in resistivity from less than 10 to over 100 m (Frolov, 1998;King et al, 1988;Overduin et al, 2012). Uncertainties in IBP depth estimated from resistivity profiles thus correspond to the depth range of the bulk sediment resistivity increase from 10 to 100 m. Mean submarine permafrost degradation rate was calculated as the quotient of the depth to IBP (z pf ) and the time of erosion (t 0 ; time of inundation).…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity and Time Of Inundationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The elastic wave and electrical resistivity were measured at 1°C increments from −10 to 10°C during thawing, and the temperature was measured at 1‐min intervals. Detailed explanations of experimental conditions and methods were addressed by Kang and Lee (2015).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the transition from relatively low to high resistivity could be sharp or gradual depending on the physical and chemical conditions of subaquatic sediments. For example, laboratory studies by Overduin et al () and Kang and Lee () showed that the resistivity of frozen silty sands can range from below 10 Ω ·m to over 1,000 Ω ·m, depending on the temperature and porewater salinity. Alternative geophysical methods like ground‐penetrating radar have proven to be effective at mapping taliks below freshwater grounded ice zones (Stevens et al, ) but are not suited for highly electrically conductive saltwater (Annan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%