2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the factor structure of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
81
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have also indicated that internal consistency of the attention to detail subscale was around .60 (Baron-Cohen et al 2001;Wakabayashi et al 2004;Hoekstra et al 2008), although test-retest reliability of this subscale over 1-6 months was within the acceptable range (r = .71; Hoekstra et al 2008). Many previous studies that conducted exploratory or confirmatory factor analyses have extracted a factor corresponding to attention to detail (Austin 2005;Hurst et al 2007;Stewart and Austin 2009;Kloosterman et al 2011; except for Lau et al 2013), indicating that attention to detail is an important dimension of autistic traits. It is suggested that future studies should reconstruct the item composition of this subscale and improve its internal consistency to examine whether the attention to detail component of autistic traits is really related to rumination and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous studies have also indicated that internal consistency of the attention to detail subscale was around .60 (Baron-Cohen et al 2001;Wakabayashi et al 2004;Hoekstra et al 2008), although test-retest reliability of this subscale over 1-6 months was within the acceptable range (r = .71; Hoekstra et al 2008). Many previous studies that conducted exploratory or confirmatory factor analyses have extracted a factor corresponding to attention to detail (Austin 2005;Hurst et al 2007;Stewart and Austin 2009;Kloosterman et al 2011; except for Lau et al 2013), indicating that attention to detail is an important dimension of autistic traits. It is suggested that future studies should reconstruct the item composition of this subscale and improve its internal consistency to examine whether the attention to detail component of autistic traits is really related to rumination and depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This finding closely matches those of two previous factor analyses of the AQ in smaller adult nonclinical samples (Austin 2005;Hurst et al 2007). Other researchers, however, have reported 2, 4, or 5 factors (Stewart and Austin 2009;Hoekstra et al 2008;Kloosterman et al 2011 Freeth et al 2013b). The three-factor solution provides empirical support for three item subsets in the AQ: one subset resembling the existing Attention to Detail subscale, and two other subsets characterised, respectively, by 'sociability' and 'mentalising' items drawn from the three traditional social subscales.…”
Section: Gap Statisticmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These CFA results, derived using LISREL 8.80 with robust maximum likelihood estimation, are presented in Table 1. Based on the set of reported fit values, the Kloosterman et al (2011) model could be regarded as providing the best solution relative to the other models. With respect to this AQ model, the reliabilities of the total score (a = .85) and the five subscales for this sample were satisfactory: Social Skills (a = .86), Communication/Mindreading (a = .71), Restricted/Repetitive Behaviour (a = .65), Attention to Details (a = .70), and Imagination (a = .65).…”
Section: Autism Spectrum Quotient (Aq)mentioning
confidence: 99%