2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-018-0071-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the factor structure of the Chinese version of the nomophobia questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
2
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
29
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by conducting regression analysis with number of hours spent on mobile phone as regressor. However, in the Italian version a three-factor structure was found (factor 1: not being able to access information, factor 2: giving up convenience/losing connectedness, and factor 3: not being able to communicate), which is different from the other translated versions (in Spanish, Persian, or Chinese) [12-15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by conducting regression analysis with number of hours spent on mobile phone as regressor. However, in the Italian version a three-factor structure was found (factor 1: not being able to access information, factor 2: giving up convenience/losing connectedness, and factor 3: not being able to communicate), which is different from the other translated versions (in Spanish, Persian, or Chinese) [12-15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors F1 -F4 are rather interesting as they show a strong positiveness and have statistically significant correlations (p<0.001), ranging from 0.61 (F1 & F2) to 0.80 (F3 & F4). Yildirim and Correia (2015), the questionnaire authors, as well as the experts like Ma and Liu (2018) claim that it refers to the four-dimensional construct. Our research further confirms that the construct has indeed four dimensions and inter-correlated factors.…”
Section: Third Model (M3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we contemplated a third correspondence formed by students with high levels of nomophobia that were also more associated with the female gender, in addition to the degree titles of Primary Education and Pedagogy, undertaking the first or second year of degree study and being aged between 17 and 20. Thus, sufficient empirical arguments exist for us to conclude that age is a key element with regards to nomophobia, as has been indicated in previous research works [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…They designed and validated an instrument composed of 20 items in order to measure nomophobia in university students in the United States. Bragazzi et al [32] then adapted this to the Italian context, including just three factors in disagreement with versions of the questionnaire that was previously adapted to Spanish [27,33] and Chinese contexts [34,35]. Prior to this, the mobile phone addiction scale (MPAS) was employed in students from Taiwan [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%