Evaluation of the Factor Structure and Content Specificity of the Interpretation Bias Task (IBT)

Abstract

Background Theories suggest that interpretation biases play a role in the aetiology of a range of psychopathology including depression, anxiety and psychosis. We evaluate the psychometric properties of an adapted version of an ambiguous scenario task (i.e., Interpretation Bias Task [IBT]) that assesses benign and negative interpretations in four domains: immediate bodily injury; long-term illness; social rejection; and, performance failure. Methods The factor structure of the IBT was evaluated in a student sample (N = 237) in Study 1, and subsequently confirmed in a community sample with a wider age range (N = 1103) in Study 2. Correlations between interpretation biases and health and social anxiety symptoms were tested in both studies. Results The four IBT domains were differentiable and each was represented by two factors (i.e., benign vs. negative). In Study 1, higher health anxiety was characterised by fewer benign interpretations for injury- and illness-related scenarios, whereas higher social anxiety was associated with more negative and fewer benign interpretations for social rejection and performance failure scenarios. Correlational results were replicated in Study 2 for social anxiety, but not health anxiety. Conclusions The IBT is suitable for measuring interpretation biases in Asian adults. The content specificity of interpretation biases was partially supported.

The interrelation between interpretation biases, threat expectancies and pain‐related attentional processing

“…We adopted an Interpretation Bias Task (IBT) (Chan, Takano, Lau, & Barry, 2020; Heathcote et al., 2016) to examine participants’ interpretations for ambiguous situations. The IBT includes four domains of ambiguous situations describing immediate bodily injury, long‐term illness, social rejection and performance failure.…”

The effects of efficacy framing in news information and health anxiety on coronavirus-disease-2019-related cognitive outcomes and interpretation bias.

“…The Interpretation Bias task (IBT; Chan, Takano, et al, 2020), that is, the Chinese adaptation of the Adolescent Interpretations of Bodily Threat task (AIBT; Heathcote et al, 2016), was used to capture interpretation biases. Its full version consists of 23 personally relevant vignettes, referring to four domains (i.e., immediate bodily injury, long-term illness, social rejection, performance failure).…”

The effects of attentional and interpretation biases on later pain outcomes among younger and older adults: A prospective study

“…To assess participants’ interpretation biases, an interpretation bias task (IBT) was adopted (Chan et al, 2020; Heathcote et al, 2016). The IBT consists of ambiguous scenarios in four domains related to immediate bodily injury, long‐term illness, social rejection and performance failure.…”