2004
DOI: 10.1080/15401420490426972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Exposure—Response Relationship of Lung Cancer Mortality and Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium Based on Published Epidemiological Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrasts analyzed here for threshold were model‐dependent; with some nonlinear model forms, discerning a real threshold might be quite difficult. On the other hand, approximate linearity of the lung cancer response in relation to cumulative exposure is quite well established for hexavalent chromium above low exposure levels (>25 μg/m 3 CrO 3 ) or low cumulative exposures (>0.1 mg‐yr/m 3 ) ( 7,8,18 ) and is supported by the fractional polynomials analyses reported here. A large intensity threshold, comparable to average exposure levels (40 μg/m 3 CrO 3 ), for example, should be identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The contrasts analyzed here for threshold were model‐dependent; with some nonlinear model forms, discerning a real threshold might be quite difficult. On the other hand, approximate linearity of the lung cancer response in relation to cumulative exposure is quite well established for hexavalent chromium above low exposure levels (>25 μg/m 3 CrO 3 ) or low cumulative exposures (>0.1 mg‐yr/m 3 ) ( 7,8,18 ) and is supported by the fractional polynomials analyses reported here. A large intensity threshold, comparable to average exposure levels (40 μg/m 3 CrO 3 ), for example, should be identifiable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The model equations described in previous studies7 8 21 22 were used to estimate the effect of cumulative exposure d (f-y/ml) on λ 0 . The multiplicative models can be represented mathematically as:λ=λ0×f(d)where λ is the estimated incidence rate for the health effect of exposure d , f( d ) is a function of cumulative exposure to asbestos d , and λ 0 is the baseline incidence rate modelled as a log linear function of the covariates including age (13 levels: <25, 25–29, 30–34, 35–39…, ≥80), calendar time period (1972–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, 2000–2006) and smoking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively clear epidemiological evidence that these genotoxic substances are human lung carcinogens, some epidemiological studies demonstrate that lung cancer risks are not increased among all groups of exposed workers, and may be greatest or even limited to those most highly exposed (2)(3)(4). This suggests that for at least some of these substances there are exposure thresholds above which risk is increased, possibly reflecting the impact of one or more protective mechanisms including DNA and/or cellular repair, clearance, dissolution, chemical reduction or transformation, etc., that reduce or eliminate the carcinogenic responses to the substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%