2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00193-017-0743-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the existing triple point path models with new experimental data: proposal of an original empirical formulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extension of the study to greater distances showed that the evolution of height of the Mach stem actually follows a parabolic law as expected from Ref. 29 rather than a linear law as done in Ref. 13.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Mach Stemsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extension of the study to greater distances showed that the evolution of height of the Mach stem actually follows a parabolic law as expected from Ref. 29 rather than a linear law as done in Ref. 13.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Mach Stemsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In the context of blast wave studies, empirical models have been developed to predict the variation of the Mach stem length generated by the reflection of strong shock waves. 29 These models describe a parabolic 29 or a cubic 30 growth of the Mach stem height. Recent studies reporting experiments of weak shock reflection but at a larger scale than the present experiment showed a good agreement with a cubic law.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Mach Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four models are available in the open literature to calculate the triple point path. They are the Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) curves (UFC 3-340-02 [4]), the empirical formula of Kinney and Graham [5], Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) [6], and Boutillier et al [7]. UFC published ten curves of the triple point path, for example, Figure 2-13 of UFC 3-340-02 [4].…”
Section: Models Of Triple Point Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The units for the height and the weight in the equation are centimetre and kiloton, respectively. Although this formula is originally obtained from nuclear explosions, it can also be used for conventional high-explosive tests [2,7]. It should be noted that a high explosive is about twice as effective at forming an air blast compared to a nuclear detonation.…”
Section: Models Of Triple Point Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation