Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients

Abstract

Background The EuroQol EQ-5D is one of the most widely researched and applied patient-reported outcome measures worldwide. The original EQ-5D-3L and more recent EQ-5D-5L include three and five response categories respectively. Evidence from healthy and sick populations shows that the additional two response categories improve measurement properties but there has not been a concurrent comparison of the two versions in patients with low back pain (LBP). Methods LBP patients taking part in a multicenter randomized controlled trial of lumbar total disc replacement and conservative treatment completed the EQ-5D-3L and 5L in an eight-year follow-up questionnaire. The 3L and 5L were assessed for aspects of data quality including missing data, floor and ceiling effects, response consistency, and based on a priori hypotheses, associations with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pain-Visual Analogue Scales and Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Results At the eight-year follow-up, 151 (87%) patients were available and 146 completed both the 3L and 5L. Levels of missing data were the same for the two versions. Compared to the EQ-5D-5L, the 3L had significantly higher floor (pain discomfort) and ceiling effects (mobility, self-care, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). For these patients the EQ-5D-5L described 73 health states compared to 28 for the 3L. Shannon’s indices showed the 5L outperformed the 3L in tests of classification efficiency. Correlations with the ODI, Pain-VAS and HSCL-25 were largely as hypothesized, the 5L having slightly higher correlations than the 3L. Conclusion The EQ-5D assesses important aspect of health in LBP patients and the 5L improves upon the 3L in this respect. The EQ-5D-5L is recommended in preference to the 3L version, however, further testing in other back pain populations together with additional measurement properties, including responsiveness to change, is recommended. Trial registration: retrospectively registered: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01704677.

Quality of Life and Depression Status of Caregivers of Patients with Femoral Neck or Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures during the First Year after Fracture Treatment

“…A strength of this study is that we used two validated quality of life scales: SF‐36 and EQ‐5D‐5L. These two instruments were validated in the general population and various medical conditions 29–32 . In addition, all data were collected prospectively, which should minimize inherent biases.…”

Effectiveness of a Group-Based Rehabilitation Program Combining Education with Multimodal Exercises in the Treatment of Patients with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Uncontrolled Study

“…In addition to the five dimensions, there is a VAS that assesses self-rated health on a vertical VAS, with endpoints labeled “best imaginable health state” (100) and “worst imaginable health state” (0). The EQ-5D is one of the most widely used PROMS to measure the quality of life in patients with LBP [ 27 ]. The MCID for individuals with LBP in Switzerland is 0.190 [ 28 ].…”

One-Year Clinical Outcomes of Minimal-Invasive Dorsal Percutaneous Fixation of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures

“…The laboratory variable group included C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBS). Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) were targeted as the dependent variables for outcome evaluations and included the German version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [ 14 ], Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) [ 15 ], the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of leg and back pain [ 16 ], and the eQ-5D health questionnaire [ 17 ]. Patients had follow-ups at regular time points to evaluate treatment success, and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively.…”