2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00234-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in colorectal tumours and lymph node metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
118
2
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
118
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, EGFR mRNA and peptide expression appeared to be not associated with the CA-SSR Ⅰ allele length, nor with the presence of MSI or AI. Our data regarding EGFR peptide expression are in accordance with those obtained by McKay et al [26] who showed no association between the distribution of CA-SSR Ⅰ alleles in colorectal tumors and EGFR peptide expression. More intriguingly, the CA-SSR Ⅰ genotype identified in normal colon samples was not predictive of EGFR mRNA expression levels.…”
Section: B Asupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, EGFR mRNA and peptide expression appeared to be not associated with the CA-SSR Ⅰ allele length, nor with the presence of MSI or AI. Our data regarding EGFR peptide expression are in accordance with those obtained by McKay et al [26] who showed no association between the distribution of CA-SSR Ⅰ alleles in colorectal tumors and EGFR peptide expression. More intriguingly, the CA-SSR Ⅰ genotype identified in normal colon samples was not predictive of EGFR mRNA expression levels.…”
Section: B Asupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(iii) the existence of different molecular patterns between primary tumour and paired metastatic lesion as predictive markers, so far, have been mostly evaluated in primary tumours disregarding alterations at metastatic sites. To shed light into this latter issue, earlier studies investigating primary tumours and paired metastases by IHC revealed different patterns of EGFR expression (McKay et al, 2002;Ooi et al, 2004;Scartozzi et al, 2004;Bralet et al, 2005;Italiano et al, 2005;Bibeau et al, 2006;Cappuzzo et al, 2007). Our data show that all primary tumours and metastases were positive, although they showed different staining intensities (data not shown).…”
Section: B Dsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It is possible, however, that primary tumour and paired metastatic lesions might be different at the molecular marker expression or gene status levels and that these differences may affect the clinical significance of a predictive test. In this contest, it is noteworthy that the few previously published studies on this issue focused almost exclusively on the rather unreliable evaluation of EGFR expression by IHC (McKay et al, 2002;Ooi et al, 2004;Scartozzi et al, 2004;Bralet et al, 2005;Italiano et al, 2005;Bibeau et al, 2006;Cappuzzo et al, 2007). The aim of this study is to analyse molecular alterations predictive for anti-EGFR therapies response, such as EGFR gene status, K-Ras and BRAF mutations, and PTEN protein expression, in primary tumour and synchronous or metachronous metastasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expression of EGFR was present in 71% of cases, which is similar to the rate of expression observed in colorectal cancer. As in colorectal cancer, the expression level of EGFR was not associated with changes in survival (McKay et al, 2002). Although limited numbers of patients have been tested, it seems that activating mutations in the KRAS oncogene are observed in approximately 40% of SBA patients, which is similar to the rate observed in colorectal cancer (Bamford et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%