2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the efficiency of different treatment modalities in individuals with painful temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a randomised controlled clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the removal of duplicates, 162 articles were identified as eligible, of which 102 were eliminated after reading of the title and abstract. Finally, after reading the full text, 48 RCTs were included [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ] in the qualitative synthesis. The studies by Angelova et al [ 59 ], Boyraz et al [ 15 ], Akaltun et al [ 58 ], and Hojjati et al [ 32 ] were excluded from the pooled quantitative analysis because of reporting average values of outcomes without measures of dispersion; hence, deriving data from their report was not possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following the removal of duplicates, 162 articles were identified as eligible, of which 102 were eliminated after reading of the title and abstract. Finally, after reading the full text, 48 RCTs were included [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ] in the qualitative synthesis. The studies by Angelova et al [ 59 ], Boyraz et al [ 15 ], Akaltun et al [ 58 ], and Hojjati et al [ 32 ] were excluded from the pooled quantitative analysis because of reporting average values of outcomes without measures of dispersion; hence, deriving data from their report was not possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies by Angelova et al [ 59 ], Boyraz et al [ 15 ], Akaltun et al [ 58 ], and Hojjati et al [ 32 ] were excluded from the pooled quantitative analysis because of reporting average values of outcomes without measures of dispersion; hence, deriving data from their report was not possible. Finally, 44 RCTs [ 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 60 ] were included in the present meta-analysis ( Figure 1 ). Additional information was requested from the authors of eight studies [ 15 , 32 , 33 , 40 , 48 , 49 , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its usefulness in clinical practice and research, few studies on the treatment of TMD have reported its application. Significant JFLS-20 scores reduction have been reported in patients with arthrogenic TMD using resilient OS but without significant differences versus other treatments in the follow-up [38]. While other reports nonsignificant difference in JFLS-20 scores between improvement and non-improvement patients treated with resilient OS in patients with subacute and chronic TMD [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%