2018 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iecbes.2018.8626703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effects of Geometrical Changes in Prosthetic Socket Towards Transfemoral Residuum via Finite Element Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of different shapes between the residuum and socket model increased the tendency of the residuum geometrical deformation. During the complete donning stage, a high amount of volume deformation occurred in the proximal area because the prosthetic socket was created using a small cross-section in the proximal area to allow the socket to fit the subject residuum well [11]. The shrinking of the residuum increased the pressure occurring in the proximal area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The selection of different shapes between the residuum and socket model increased the tendency of the residuum geometrical deformation. During the complete donning stage, a high amount of volume deformation occurred in the proximal area because the prosthetic socket was created using a small cross-section in the proximal area to allow the socket to fit the subject residuum well [11]. The shrinking of the residuum increased the pressure occurring in the proximal area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the results of the proximal and distal areas showed that the pressure distribution on the surface of the proximal area in both the MCCT and UCLA sockets was higher than in the distal area. The results showed that the prosthetic socket was designed to minimize the pressure in the distal area such that the postoperation wound and scars in the residuum would not be affected, while at the same time the pressure in the proximal area was maximized to make the socket properly fit the subject's residuum [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The socket was inspired and created based on the standard IRC socket. The difference between the two sockets is that the stability of the IRC-MCCT socket was improved by the adjustment of the anterolateral and sagittal directions of the IRC-UCLA socket [13], as shown in Figure 1 and the method used to produce the IRC-MCCT socket uses MCCT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%