2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Effect of Rotary Systems on Stresses in a New Testing Model Using a 3-Dimensional Printed Simulated Resin Root with an Oval-shaped Canal: A Finite Element Analysis Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater loss of dentine in the cervical region may be the reason for comparatively higher stresses in ProTaper model (Mahran & AboEl-Fotouh 2008). Similar to the present results, a recent FEA study demonstrated that stresses were greater in a ProTaper Universal prepared model under oblique loading (Eken et al 2016). The authors stated that substantial coronal structure loss may be a disadvantage under occlusal forces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Greater loss of dentine in the cervical region may be the reason for comparatively higher stresses in ProTaper model (Mahran & AboEl-Fotouh 2008). Similar to the present results, a recent FEA study demonstrated that stresses were greater in a ProTaper Universal prepared model under oblique loading (Eken et al 2016). The authors stated that substantial coronal structure loss may be a disadvantage under occlusal forces.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The widely used Von Misses stresses were not applied because they represent a combination of the absolute values squared of all stresses (Eken et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) and stress values (Eken et al . ) of different rotary file systems, centring ability of access preparations (Yahata et al . ) and different obturation techniques for C‐shaped canals (Gok et al .…”
Section: Review Of Endodontic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%