2018
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2018.1482262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the ecological efficiency of landscape protection in areas of different protection status. A case study from Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of changes that took place, the area has natural richness, clean air, large water and forest supplies, the good physical structure of the settlements and diversity in the ways of living [50]. The similar analysis conducted in relation to different types of Polish protected areas also showed that the landscape quality of national parks is substantially higher than of other forms of nature protection [51]. Generally, the high effectiveness of landscape metrics to reflect the structural and ecological quality of protected areas was proven by many studies, both to conclude on the general level of quality [52], as well as on selected layers of ecological state, such as naturalness or wetland loss and fragmentation [53].…”
Section: Landscape Quality Of Test Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of changes that took place, the area has natural richness, clean air, large water and forest supplies, the good physical structure of the settlements and diversity in the ways of living [50]. The similar analysis conducted in relation to different types of Polish protected areas also showed that the landscape quality of national parks is substantially higher than of other forms of nature protection [51]. Generally, the high effectiveness of landscape metrics to reflect the structural and ecological quality of protected areas was proven by many studies, both to conclude on the general level of quality [52], as well as on selected layers of ecological state, such as naturalness or wetland loss and fragmentation [53].…”
Section: Landscape Quality Of Test Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group includes broad studies on the identification of spatial and temporal landscape changes. These are mainly comparative analyses of maps from different periods, often using landscape metrics as basic indicators for identifying changes in the landscape [28][29][30][31]. The second group includes research on attempts to identify and understand the processes and forces that influenced the further direction of landscape development-the so-called driving forces of landscape changes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequently proposed methods for monitoring landscape changes is the use of appropriate indicators. In order to assess the intensity of transformations, the following indicators are used: changes in landscape metrics [28,65,66], indicators determining the dynamics of changes in individual land use types [67,68] or indicators determining changes in landscape visual character [69]. The proposed landscape change index (LCI) is in line with the global trend of searching for indicators enabling the monitoring of changes.…”
Section: The Use Of Indicator Methods In Monitoring Landscape Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%