2019
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Dutch neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Abstract: BackgroundIn 2002, a nationwide screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) was introduced in the Netherlands. The aim of our study is to evaluate the validity of the neonatal screening for CAH and to assess how many newborns with salt-wasting (SW) CAH have already been clinically diagnosed before the screening result was known.MethodsRetrospective, descriptive study. The following data of patients with positive screening results since implementation of the screening programme were collected (1 January … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 20 years screening programs for CAH have reported variable results for recall rates ranging between 0.002-1.2%, for PPV ranging between 0.1-60% and for sensitivity ranging between 75-100% ( 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ). Despite higher costs, recall rates are lower and PPVs are better with two-tier screening programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years screening programs for CAH have reported variable results for recall rates ranging between 0.002-1.2%, for PPV ranging between 0.1-60% and for sensitivity ranging between 75-100% ( 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ). Despite higher costs, recall rates are lower and PPVs are better with two-tier screening programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative diagnostic methods and screening protocols have previously been evaluated. Suggestions for quality improvement include gestational age-based cut-off points [ 5 , 20 ] or a combination of birthweight and gestational age [ 21 ]. Implementation of a second screen at two weeks of life improves the positive predictive value as noted but adds cost and may be impractical or logistically difficult in some regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In addition, not all programmes can provide the result in the first week of life. 20,[28][29][30] For better and efficient management of the CAH screening, each screening programme needs persistent improvement in quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%