2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the distribution of heavy metals and their chemical forms in ESP-fractions of fly ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from Tables 3a, 3b, for all the fractions, most of trace elements gave higher leaching rates for TCLP 1311 compared to ASTM method due to its slightly harsher conditions. It is also possible to say that higher trace element concentrations (Cd, Pb, Cu) were observed in the leachates of finer particle size fractions for TCLP 1311 method [42]. Higher Cr (VI) concentrations were detected in the leachates of the finest particle size fraction for both test methods.…”
Section: Results Of the Toxicity Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As seen from Tables 3a, 3b, for all the fractions, most of trace elements gave higher leaching rates for TCLP 1311 compared to ASTM method due to its slightly harsher conditions. It is also possible to say that higher trace element concentrations (Cd, Pb, Cu) were observed in the leachates of finer particle size fractions for TCLP 1311 method [42]. Higher Cr (VI) concentrations were detected in the leachates of the finest particle size fraction for both test methods.…”
Section: Results Of the Toxicity Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Coal contains significant amount of various trace metals. Most of these trace elements are emitted largely in the fly ash or in association with the surface species of fly ash particles during coal combustion [9][10][11][12]. It has been reported that trace element concentrations in fly ash are sometimes 4-10 times higher than their original concentrations in coal samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the measured TEs concentration in fly ash, Be, Cd, Ni, and Pb were detected in fly ash while concentrations of As, Hg, Se, and Cr were below detection limit. A study by Swietlik et al (2012) reported the occurrence of Cd and Pb in fly ash from ESP where Cd was detected at very low concentration (<1.5 mg/kg), indicating discharge to the atmosphere, while Pb concentration was increasing with decreasing particle size, which confirmed the mechanism of formation through a volatilization-condensation process.…”
Section: Tes Behavior In Flue Gasmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is due to the volatilization of TEs during combustion and condensation on the surface of fly ash particles. A study by Swietlik et al (2012) showed that the concentrations of volatile TEs (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) increase with decreasing particle size of fly ash that has higher surface area, whereas hardly volatile TEs (Fe and Mn) showed slight reduction. The elements in fly ash from firing of subbituminous and bituminous coal are shown in Table 8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F(5) fraction was extracted in the same way as sample pre-treatment in order to determine the pseudo-total metal content (HNO 3 /H 2 O 2 , microwave assisted) . It was called an environmentally persistent fraction to differentiate it from the term residue fraction which is commonly used when sample digestion is carried out in the presence of HF ( Swietlik et al, 2012). In this way the metal distribution pattern obtained involves only that part of total metal content which may be potentially mobilisable with changing environmental conditions in ecological timescale.…”
Section: Chemical Fractionationmentioning
confidence: 99%