2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the different definitions of the convective mass transfer coefficient for water evaporation into air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat transfer coefficient is used to model the heat transfer (convective and radiant) between the environment and the surface of the porous material (walls, furniture…). The mass transfer coefficient models the moisture transfer between the air and the porous material [13]. They have to be determined indirectly through empirical or analytical correlations or from CFD calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat transfer coefficient is used to model the heat transfer (convective and radiant) between the environment and the surface of the porous material (walls, furniture…). The mass transfer coefficient models the moisture transfer between the air and the porous material [13]. They have to be determined indirectly through empirical or analytical correlations or from CFD calculations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air and salt solution flows are assumed to be laminar and fully developed for the practical operating range of RAMEEs, therefore the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients for a given design are constant since the Nusselt number for a fully developed laminar flow is constant and is equal to 8.24 for a uniform heat flux in a parallel plate channel [26].Thus, U m /U is only a function of air channel thickness, th, (since for a constant Nusselt number, the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients change with th) the thickness of membrane, d, and the heat conductivity and mass conductivity of the membrane, k and k m . Therefore, for a given membrane and air channel thickness the ratio of U m to U is constant Therefore, for a given membrane and air channel thickness, the ratio of U m to U is constant provided that analogy between heat and mass transfer applies in the airstream and the flow configuration (counterflow in this paper) remains constant [27,28]. For other conditions and designs, the heat and mass transfer coefficients and the ratio of Um to U may change [27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: System Parametersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An internal coupling approach is used where both the porous material domain and the air domain are solved within the same solver. As a result there is no need for mass transfer coefficients to couple the mass transport between both domains [51]. In a more classical approach, HAM models use transfer coefficients to link the transport in the porous material with transport in the surrounding air.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of a Cfd-ham Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the airflow and by consequence the transfer coefficient depend on the air temperature and relative humidity. More details on this matter are found in [14,51]. Figure 9 shows a comparison of the measured and simulated relative humidity and temperature at three depths in the calcium silicate sample.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of a Cfd-ham Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%