The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Credibility of Reflectorless Distance Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptable value of ΔD is given by the Equation (2) [5] for the desired confidence level (x) Tables 1-10. The symbol (------) means that the instrument did not measure the distance to the target.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The acceptable value of ΔD is given by the Equation (2) [5] for the desired confidence level (x) Tables 1-10. The symbol (------) means that the instrument did not measure the distance to the target.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ascertain the accuracy of the RLTS at short range distances, several studies were carried out. The accuracy of RTLS was investigated by [9] for distances up to 100 m, by [2] for distances up to 300 feet (≅90 m), by [12] for distances up to 60 m and by [5] for distances up to 50 m. This paper studies the effect of target material, target size and incidence angle of laser beam on the accuracy of reflectorless measurements for distances up to 1000 m. A series of experimental measurements for 10 different distances were carried out using targets of 6 different materials and 4 different sizes at 5 different incidence angles. The distances obtained by reflectorless surveys were compared to the distances obtained by prism surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, this research showed that increasing inclining angle leads to increase of distance measurement error. Research for the accuracy of distances measured by reflectorless technology in the range of 50 m resulted by conclusion that correct measurement fluctuates between 20% and 85%, which means that reflectorless technology needs improvement [11]. The long-range reflectorless distance (up to 1000 m) measurements show that the accuracy is dependent on the incidence angle and that the size of target shall increase with distance [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…±0.0003 grads(Lambrou and Pantazis, 2010). Classical methods of surveying (tacheometric) were implemented by observing the shell of the cooling tower in 20 vertical and horizontal point strips through a commonly used 3D polar method (re ectorless distance measurement).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%