2022
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/17/05/p05028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Constant Fraction Time-Over-Threshold (CF-TOT) method for neutron-gamma pulse shape discrimination

Abstract: The use of Time-over-Threshold (TOT) for the discrimination between fast neutrons and gamma-rays is advantageous when large number of detection channels are required due to the simplicity of its implementation. However, the results obtained using the standard, Constant Threshold TOT (CT-TOT) are usually inferior to those obtained using other pulse shape discrimination (PSD) methods, such as Charge Comparison or Zero-Crossing approaches, especially for low amplitude neutron/gamma-ray pulses. We ev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively high TTR corresponds to pulses with an increased delayed fluorescence emission with respect to the prompt fluorescence emission. Despite the increasing number of alternative PSD approaches, e.g., based on zero-crossing [7,8,9,10,11], time-over-threshold [12] and machine-learning [13,14], the CI remains the most frequently-used method for PSD. While being simple to implement, CI requires a lengthy, source-and material-specific optimization of the pulse integration gate parameters, which is typically performed by evaluating the PSD figure-of-merit [15] for many iterations of such parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A relatively high TTR corresponds to pulses with an increased delayed fluorescence emission with respect to the prompt fluorescence emission. Despite the increasing number of alternative PSD approaches, e.g., based on zero-crossing [7,8,9,10,11], time-over-threshold [12] and machine-learning [13,14], the CI remains the most frequently-used method for PSD. While being simple to implement, CI requires a lengthy, source-and material-specific optimization of the pulse integration gate parameters, which is typically performed by evaluating the PSD figure-of-merit [15] for many iterations of such parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing multi-channel Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) are all based on the CT-ToT [15,16] method. In a recent publication [17] we analysed a different variant of ToT, using a constant fraction method (CF-ToT), demonstrating its superior performance in neutron/gamma PSD compared to CT-ToT, for energies in the range 100-1000 keVee. Since CF-ToT is independent of pulse amplitude and varies solely with the pulse shape, it can potentially serve as a better alternative for the design of future multi-channel PSD circuits that avoid pulse digitization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%