1992
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199212000-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the consistency of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a surgical intensive care unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
10

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, it was somehow unexpected that APACHE II score did not prove to be predictive of mortality in US patients. Although the mean APACHE II score in our study (12.7 AE 2.8) is in accordance with that reported in previous studies (Bernstein and Offenbartl, 1991;Berger et al, 1992;Goffi et al, 1999;Koperna et al, 2001), the narrow range of APACHE II scores of our sample (7-23) might have reduced the ability to detect a predictive role.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, it was somehow unexpected that APACHE II score did not prove to be predictive of mortality in US patients. Although the mean APACHE II score in our study (12.7 AE 2.8) is in accordance with that reported in previous studies (Bernstein and Offenbartl, 1991;Berger et al, 1992;Goffi et al, 1999;Koperna et al, 2001), the narrow range of APACHE II scores of our sample (7-23) might have reduced the ability to detect a predictive role.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As it was expected, mortality rate was remarkably higher among patients who underwent US, than in patients who received ES. US is by itself a well-defined predictor of mortality at any age (Hosking et al, 1989;Berger et al, 1992;Bufalari et al, 1996;ElHaddawi et al, 2002;Arenal and Bengoechea-Beeby, 2003). This study differs from other studies of mortality in surgical older patients in that it aimed to investigate predictors of mortality among a wide series of variables, including conventional scores (ASA and APACHE II), anamnestic and clinical variables, measures of functional and cognitive status, and presence and severity of comorbid illnesses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the control group, ASA physical status was routinely assessed prior to the surgery. Disease severity scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) (Berger et al 1992) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (Moreno et al 1999), were calculated daily, at the time of sample collection. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula was used to calculate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Levey et al 1999).…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate sedation frequency, the records of 492 patients were retrospectively studied to identify those receiving sedative drugs. Exclusion criteria were patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without documented exams for severity index calculation and APACHE II prognosis 14 . The sample was reduced to 307 patients who were divided in two groups: non-sedated group (NSG), with patients not receiving any type of sedatives (n = 192); and sedated group (SG), with patients who were sedated while admitted (n = 115).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was reduced to 307 patients who were divided in two groups: non-sedated group (NSG), with patients not receiving any type of sedatives (n = 192); and sedated group (SG), with patients who were sedated while admitted (n = 115). Both groups were compared as to gender, age and initial severity according to APACHE II index 14 . Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis of results, taking into account the nature of studied variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%