2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the commercially available LightMix® Modular E-gene kit using clinical and proficiency testing specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection

Abstract: Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre-including this research content-immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study included archived respiratory specimens from COVID-2019 patients with laboratory confirmation by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the E or RdRp-Hel gene as described previously [ 12 , 13 ]. The respiratory specimens included nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, endotracheal aspirate, and sputum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study included archived respiratory specimens from COVID-2019 patients with laboratory confirmation by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the E or RdRp-Hel gene as described previously [ 12 , 13 ]. The respiratory specimens included nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, endotracheal aspirate, and sputum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific among 17 respiratory viruses, except SARS-CoV. Similar sensitivity with in-house assays (144/28949.8% (144/289) for RdRp/Hel & 50.5 (146/289) for N, In-house RdRp/Hel and -N assays were specific without the interference of SARS-CoV 289 [ 101 ] RT-PCR Cepheids Xpert Xpress kit ( N2,E) In house RdRp, N1, E Cepheids Xpert Xpress 8.26 cp mL −1 NP, Nasal wash Specific, three samples containing various concentrations of heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus tested positive at three laboratories in both the in-house RT-PCR and the GeneXpert. LOD was lower than the company claim (250 cp mL −1 ).…”
Section: Novel Developed Technologies For Sars-cov-2 Detectionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To date, primers and probes used in different RT-PCR assays mainly target ORF1ab, S, E, N regions of SARS-CoV-2 [1,14,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. Coronaviruses have a high frequency of mutations and recombination [25][26][27], which may result in mismatches with the currently used primers and probes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For diagnostic performance evaluation, 213 initial clinical specimens including NPA, NPS, throat swab or saliva collected from 213 hospitalized patients (male: female = 112: 101; median age: 48 years; range: 62 days-103 years) with suspected COVID-19 were included for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Some of these specimens were evaluated previously using our in-house RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection [21]. To further determine the clinical utility of our novel STN real-time RT-PCR assays, we included hospitalized patients with sequential respiratory and non-respiratory specimens sent for SARS-CoV-2 detection for whom the first specimen tested positive but subsequent specimens tested negative by our previously described validated COVID-19-RdRp/Hel real-time RT-PCR assay [14].…”
Section: Viruses Clinical Specimens and Proficiency Testing Samples mentioning
confidence: 99%