2009
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v35i4.76810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the CDC safe water-storage intervention to improve the microbiological quality of point-of-use drinking water in rural communities in South Africa

Abstract: The use of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite solutions (placebo; 1% and 3.5% sodium hypochlorite solutions) and 2 water-storage containers (traditional plastic container and the improved CDC safe water-storage container) as interventions in 2 rural communities using different water sources (improved vs. unimproved) was evaluated over a period of 4 months. Standard methods were used to determine the presence of indicator organisms (total coliforms, faecal coliforms, Escherichia coli, faecal entero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 2004 a spate of surveys and technical papers have noted that up to 70% of municipal waste treatment facilities in South Africa face collapse for lack of proper maintenance and extension, while about a third require"immediate intervention" and another third intervention "within the short to medium term" [12,13]. Experts point out that the country's local authorities are increasingly unable to cope with the constant demand for effective sewage treatment [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2004 a spate of surveys and technical papers have noted that up to 70% of municipal waste treatment facilities in South Africa face collapse for lack of proper maintenance and extension, while about a third require"immediate intervention" and another third intervention "within the short to medium term" [12,13]. Experts point out that the country's local authorities are increasingly unable to cope with the constant demand for effective sewage treatment [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for the upstream exceeded the recommended limits only in November and in the downstream section in August and September. The high levels of total coliforms in surface water sources were the result of the high rates of contamination from faecal and environment wastes [15]. These high coliform counts are associated with waterborne diseases caused by pathogenic organisms such as Shigella spp, Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella spp and pathogenic E. coli [20].…”
Section: B Microbiological Water Quality Of Surface Water Sources Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Makhera et al [14] pH values ranging from 3.0 to 10.5 could favour the growth of both indicators and pathogenic micro-organisms. In addition, microorganisms are affected differently in the water sources due to the changes of pH and temperatures of water sources [11,15]. Nevertheless, the pH of the study sites was within the South African Water Quality Guidelines standard limits and WHO guideline values [16][17].…”
Section: A the Effects Of Physical Parameters On The Microbialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variations led to significant variations in ECD rates and HAZ 2 scores. This is one indicator as to why point-of-use ceramic filters have proven to be e↵ective at reducing ECD rates (Hunter, 2009) worldwide and why safe water systems that prevent biological layer formation have improved water quality in South Africa (Potgieter et al , 2009). The container cleaning experiment results are given in Figure A.12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%