2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-020-02033-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Carbon Dioxide Production by Fungi Under Different Growing Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained µ = 0.040 with a 95% of confidence interval of 0.039-0.042 and standard error of 0.001. The results shown in Figure 3 are similar to those reported by Cruz-Barrera et al [9] for Trichoderma asperellum Th204 during SSF, who found that the CO 2 accumulation indicated the lag phase occurred from 0 to 20 h, the exponential phase from 20 to 80 h, and the stationary phase from 100 to 160 h. Similarly, in the present work, CO 2 production was observed even at the end of the process, as the microorganisms continued to grow on the inert support, and it is an indicator of metabolic activity of B. bassiana mycelium [39]. Some authors have reported the respiratory activity as an indirect indicator of fungal growth from Aspergillus niger GH1 [26], Trichoderma harzianum IRDT22C [26], Metarhizium anisopliae strain CP-OAX [10], and Metarhizium anisopliae IBCB 425 [40], but there is no information available for Beauveria bassiana.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We obtained µ = 0.040 with a 95% of confidence interval of 0.039-0.042 and standard error of 0.001. The results shown in Figure 3 are similar to those reported by Cruz-Barrera et al [9] for Trichoderma asperellum Th204 during SSF, who found that the CO 2 accumulation indicated the lag phase occurred from 0 to 20 h, the exponential phase from 20 to 80 h, and the stationary phase from 100 to 160 h. Similarly, in the present work, CO 2 production was observed even at the end of the process, as the microorganisms continued to grow on the inert support, and it is an indicator of metabolic activity of B. bassiana mycelium [39]. Some authors have reported the respiratory activity as an indirect indicator of fungal growth from Aspergillus niger GH1 [26], Trichoderma harzianum IRDT22C [26], Metarhizium anisopliae strain CP-OAX [10], and Metarhizium anisopliae IBCB 425 [40], but there is no information available for Beauveria bassiana.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…An elevated CO 2 has been demonstrated to have a highly variable impact on fungal growth as it depends on the environment. Fungal mycelium needs a high concentration of CO 2 to grow (Pavlík et al, 2020). For instance, the number of Aspergillus is constant while the number of Penicillium decreases when the carbon dioxide level is elevated (Tang, Kuehn and Simcik, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO 2 emissions occurring due to the biological respiration process of the mycelium in A1-A3 are based on the study by Pavlík et al (2020). The published average respiration emissions for the growth of Pleurotus ostreatus on beech sawdust (Fagus sylvatica) for a growing duration of 14 days (i.e.…”
Section: Biogenic Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%