2013
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-301-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the carbon cycle components in the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM)

Abstract: The recently developed Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM) is employed for simulations contributing to the CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5) experiments and the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-AR5). In this manuscript, we focus on evaluating the ocean and land carbon cycle components of the NorESM, based on the preindustrial control and historical simulations. Many of the observed large scale ocean biogeochemical features are reproduced satis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
133
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(136 reference statements)
4
133
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle model (HAMOCC;Maier-Reimer, 1993;Maier-Reimer et al, 2005) has been implemented into MICOM by Assmann et al (2010). The HAMOCC version used in NorESM1-ME is further described by Tjiputra et al (2013) and Schwinger et al (2016). We note that HAMOCC, since it was implemented into MI-COM, has also been further developed by the biogeochemistry group at the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg.…”
Section: The Marine Biogeochemistry Model Micom-hamoccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HAMburg Ocean Carbon Cycle model (HAMOCC;Maier-Reimer, 1993;Maier-Reimer et al, 2005) has been implemented into MICOM by Assmann et al (2010). The HAMOCC version used in NorESM1-ME is further described by Tjiputra et al (2013) and Schwinger et al (2016). We note that HAMOCC, since it was implemented into MI-COM, has also been further developed by the biogeochemistry group at the Max Planck Institute in Hamburg.…”
Section: The Marine Biogeochemistry Model Micom-hamoccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses the same sea-ice and land models, but a different ocean component and a different aerosol module embedded in the atmosphere model. Here, we use the model version that participated in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5; Taylor et al, 2012), and that has been described and evaluated in a series of papers Iversen et al, 2013;Tjiputra et al, 2013;Kirkevåg et al, 2013). The only difference between the published model version and the model version employed for this study, is the coupling of prognostic sea-air DMS fluxes calculated by the ocean biogeochemistry component to the atmosphere model (as opposed to the use of prescribed climatological DMS emissions in the CMIP5 model version).…”
Section: Model Description and Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSL variations are related to changes in density of the water columns and changes in the ocean bottom pressure (Gill and Niller 1973). The changes in ocean bottom pressure represent the redistribution of Tjiputra et al (2013) mass by the ocean circulation in response to the atmospheric forcing. This does not include here the changes in the mass of the ocean associated with glacier and ice sheet mass loss or land water storage changes.…”
Section: A Contribution From Dynamic Sea Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NorESM is a fully coupled climate-biogeochemical model [Tjiputra et al, 2013]. It is the fully coupled version of Model 8 described above.…”
Section: A18 Model 19mentioning
confidence: 99%