2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02399-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Bruker MALDI Biotyper for Identification of Gram-Positive Rods: Development of a Diagnostic Algorithm for the Clinical Laboratory

Abstract: Reported matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification rates of Gram-positive rods (GPR) are low compared to identification rates of Gram-positive cocci. In this study, three sample preparation methods were compared for MALDI-TOF MS identification of 190 well-characterized GPR strains: direct transfer, direct transfer-formic acid preparation, and ethanol-formic acid extraction. Using the interpretation criteria recommended by the manufacturer, identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
80
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, optimal sample preparation of molds for identification by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper requires-according to the manufacturer-a liquid subculture and the ethanol-formic acid extraction procedure. This procedure is more time-consuming than the direct transfer preparation protocol that is suitable to identify most bacteria (24,25). Collecting fungal material directly from solid medium (agar plates) instead of harvesting it from liquid subculture has been proposed by others and could simplify sample preparation and save time (14,15,19,23,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, optimal sample preparation of molds for identification by the Bruker MALDI Biotyper requires-according to the manufacturer-a liquid subculture and the ethanol-formic acid extraction procedure. This procedure is more time-consuming than the direct transfer preparation protocol that is suitable to identify most bacteria (24,25). Collecting fungal material directly from solid medium (agar plates) instead of harvesting it from liquid subculture has been proposed by others and could simplify sample preparation and save time (14,15,19,23,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species inconsistencies at a cutoff of 1.7 were observed especially for Aspergillus glaucus, Aspergillus unguis, Fusarium spp., and Penicillium spp. To minimize this problem, we suggest using a two-step interpretation as has previously been proposed for the identification of Gram-positive rod-shaped bacteria: in a first step, data interpretation is done according to the standard criteria (species cutoff of 2.0), and in a second step, a lower species cutoff (preferably 1.7) is applied for those isolates that did not yield species identification when using the standard species cutoff value of 2.0 (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some participants routinely utilize the so-called direct transfer method (30,32) and/or the ethanol-formic acid (FA) protocol recommended by Bruker Daltonics (30,33), the group at RKI primarily uses the trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) inactivation/sample preparation method (34). A large advantage of inactivation by gamma irradiation is that this method is compatible with all of these sample preparation protocols: microbial isolates inactivated by gamma irradiation can in principle be further processed by utilizing any of the different laboratory-specific methodologies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of Nocardia nova and Nocardia otitidiscaviarum, Nocardia species were not identified, nor were Tsukamurella or Gordonia species. Schulthess et al evaluated the Biotyper system (database v3.1.2.0) for identification of gram-positive bacilli (18 ). Using the manufacturer's interpretative criteria and an initial collection of 190 isolates, 85% and 87% of the grampositive bacilli studied were identified to the genus level with on-plate formic acid testing and formal extraction, respectively, compared to 72% with direct colony testing.…”
Section: Performance Of Maldi-tof Ms For Identification Of Aerobic Bamentioning
confidence: 99%