Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin‐modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC)

Karadaş, Muhammet; Cantekin, Kenan; Gümüş, Hüsniye; Ateş, Sabit Melih; Duymuş, Zeynep Yesïl

doi:10.1002/sca.21284

Cited by 32 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since there was no resin structure in BD and RMTA, the bond with composite resin is completely micromechanical [19].…”

Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-based Materials

Shin¹,

Kim²,

Nam³

et al. 2018

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to measure the shear bond strength (SBS) of different adhesive systems to calcium silicatebased materials (Biodentine and RetroMTA). Eighty cylindrical acrylic blocks, with a hole (5.0 mm diameter, 2.0 mm height) in each, were prepared. The holes were filled with Biodentine (BD) and RetroMTA (RMTA), and the specimens were divided into 2 groups. Each group was classified into 4 subgroups: Clearfil TM SE (CSE) ; AQ bond (AQ) ; All bond universal Self-etch (ABU-SE) ; and All bond universal Total-etch (ABU-TE). After the application of different adhesive systems, composite resin (Z350) was applied over BD and RMTA. The SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and the data were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney test. The highest and lowest values of SBS were observed for BD-ABUSE and RMTA-AQ, respectively. No significant differences were found in the SBS between ABU-TE and ABUSE and between ABU-TE and CSE to BD and RMTA. According to the data, BD showed a higher SBS than did RMTA when BD and RMTA are compared in the same adhesive agents. Further, among all groups, composite resin with ABUSE showed better bond strength to BD and RMTA.

show abstract

“…Since there was no resin structure in BD and RMTA, the bond with composite resin is completely micromechanical [19].…”

Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-based Materials

Shin¹,

Kim²,

Nam³

et al. 2018

THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…TheraCal LC exhibits higher bond strength values than Biodentine when layered with either composite or glassionomer cement [128,129]. To enhance SBS, E&R adhesives are recommended when placing composite restoration on TheraCal LC (Tables 2 and 3) [81].…”

Section: Theracal Lcmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is aimed at analyzing the available research and comparing the properties of bio-inductive materials in direct and indirect pulp capping procedures. The properties and clinical performances of four calcium-silicate cements (ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, RetroMTA, Biodentine), a light-cured calcium silicate-based material (TheraCal LC) and an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer (ACTIVA BioACTIVE) are widely discussed. A correlation of in vitro and in vivo data revealed that, currently, the most validated material for pulp capping procedures is still MTA. Despite Biodentine's superiority in relatively easier manipulation, competitive pricing and predictable clinical outcome, more long-term clinical studies on Biodentine as a pulp capping agent are needed. According to available research, there is also insufficient evidence to support the use of TheraCal LC or ACTIVA BioACTIVE BASE/LINER in vital pulp therapy.

show abstract

“…Theracal LC and Biodentine are tricalcium silica‐based cements that can be used in direct and indirect PC, but they have a high cost. Theracal LC provides a more clinically efficient solution because of its good sealing capabilities and curing with light (Karadas, Cantekin, Gumus, Ates, & Duymus, ). Biodentine has demonstrated good results in previous studies when used in PC (Nowicka et al, ; Parinyaprom et al, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond strength and adaptation of pulp capping materials to dentin

Karadaş

Atıcı

2020

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) and internal marginal adaptation of pulp-capping materials to dentin. Flat occlusal deep dentin surfaces were produced and randomly assigned to two groups (sound or artificial caries-affected dentin). The specimens in each group were assigned to one of seven subgroups according to the materials used: Biodentine, Theracal LC, Ultra-Blend plus, Calcimol LC, ApaCal ART, EQUIA Forte, and Ionoseal. Buildups (3-mm inner diameter and 2-mm deep) were made over the dentin surfaces. The bonded specimens were tested under shear forces at a crosshead speed of 0.8 mm/min and fracture modes were determined using a stereomicroscope at 25× magnification. The materials were applied to the pulp floor of prepared Class I cavities and then the cavities were restored with composite resin. Restored molar teeth were subjected to 5,000 thermocycles and sectioned in a bucco-lingual direction. Resin replicas were made to determine the adaptation at the pulp floor with scanning electron microscopy. Significant differences were determined among both bond strengths and gap formations of the materials. EQUIA Forte applied to both dentin substrates had a significantly higher SBS than the other materials. The bond strength of each material was not influenced by the dentin condition. Biodentine (3.03%), EQUIA Forte (7.83%), and Theracal LC (13.37%) had lower gap formations compared to other materials but were not significantly different from each other. K E Y W O R D S adaptation, bond strength, pulp capping, replica, scanning electron microscopy

show abstract

Evaluation of the bond strength of different adhesive agents to a resin‐modified calcium silicate material (TheraCal LC)

Cited by 32 publications

References 42 publications

Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-based Materials

Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-based Materials

Bio-Inductive Materials in Direct and Indirect Pulp Capping—A Review Article

Bond strength and adaptation of pulp capping materials to dentin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About