1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02441619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the attenuation coefficients in normal and pathological breast tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result for the breast sample is shown by the squares in figure 10(c). The overall attenuation within this region is approximately 0.6 dB cm −1 MHz −1 , which is somewhat lower than that found in larger studies reported in the literature (D’Astous and Foster 1986, Landini and Sarnelli 1986). …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The result for the breast sample is shown by the squares in figure 10(c). The overall attenuation within this region is approximately 0.6 dB cm −1 MHz −1 , which is somewhat lower than that found in larger studies reported in the literature (D’Astous and Foster 1986, Landini and Sarnelli 1986). …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Other studies involving breast tissue characterization using QUS obtained similar results for differentiating benign from malignant breast features3536 but without linkage to predicting treatment response. For instance, in D’Astous et al 35,.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…measurements of frequency-dependent ultrasound attenuation and backscatter signal from ex vivo samples of breast tissues including fat, parenchyma, and infiltrating ductal carcinoma demonstrated that frequency-dependent attenuation was discriminative among those tissues. Similarly, Landini et al 36. demonstrated that invasive ductal carcinoma could be differentiated from fatty, fibrotic, and parenchymal tissues on the basis of its frequency-dependent attenuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In liver disease, inflamed livers were shown to have lower than normal attenuation coefficients while cirrhotic livers have higher than normal attenuation coefficients (Kuc and Schwartz, 1979). In breast tissue, the attenuation coefficient is low for fatty tissue and medullary carcinoma and high for infiltrating ductal carcinoma and fibrosis (Landini et al, 1985;Landini and Sarnelli, 1986). Accurate characterization of tissue pathologies using ultrasonic attenuation is strongly dependent on the accuracy of the algorithm that is used to obtain the attenuation coefficient estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%