2015
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the appropriateness of dosing, indication and safety of rivaroxaban in a community hospital

Abstract: Though offering potential advantages over warfarin, the use of rivaroxaban should be monitored to increase appropriateness of therapy and improve patient safety. Therapeutic interchanges, pharmacist-directed interventions and other initiatives can be implemented to ensure appropriate use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have indicated that pharmacist interventions in the follow-up of patients with VKAs generate significant cost avoidance 12. Moreover, a recent study showed similar figures on the inappropriateness of the prescription 13. Both inappropriateness ratios were above 28%, which is the net cost benefit breakpoint in our sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, other studies have indicated that pharmacist interventions in the follow-up of patients with VKAs generate significant cost avoidance 12. Moreover, a recent study showed similar figures on the inappropriateness of the prescription 13. Both inappropriateness ratios were above 28%, which is the net cost benefit breakpoint in our sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…(C) Real‐world studies results concerning dose adjustments of apixaban. (D) Results from direct oral anticoagulants overall adjustments regarding dose appropriateness…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canadian study, 44 where a total of 47 patients were included, among (D) Results from direct oral anticoagulants overall adjustments regarding dose appropriateness 5,9,11,25,27,28,32,34,37,39,40,42,44,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] whom 25 (53%) were receiving apixaban inconsistent with the ARIS-TOTLE trial and the product monograph.…”
Section: Study and Also By A Smallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this has been reported to be as high as 10 to 20% in other studies. 13,28,29 We demonstrated that these patients could be identified quickly through our nurse-led pathway and that timely corrective action and education were easily instituted by telephone.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Bleeding or Recurrencementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Indeed published surveys report up to a third of hospital patients may receive an incorrect dose or are inappropriately prescribed a NOAC even when contraindicated. [11][12][13][14] The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) 15 and European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) 16 provide practical guidance on the use of NOACs, emphasizing the need for appropriate patient selection, minimizing unnecessary drug-drug interactions, and monitoring for dosing errors, adherence, or adverse effects. Several models of care for the optimal follow-up and clinical monitoring of patients receiving therapy with NOACs have been proposed, 17 but there are currently no published studies evaluating the effectiveness of a nurse-led approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%