2018
DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000001687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Adequacy of the 2010 Revised World Health Organization Recommended Dosages of the First-line Antituberculosis Drugs for Children

Abstract: The high frequency of low rifampin and ethambutol Cmax in our study is consistent with emerging pharmacokinetic data in children treated according to the new WHO recommendations. Higher dosages than currently recommended especially for rifampin may be necessary in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, one study among children aged Յ10 years treated according to the WHO 2010 revised dosages reported low 2-hour-postdose concentrations (C-2 h) of RIF, EMB, and PZA in 94%, 85%, and 45% of the children, respectively (13), while another among infants who were treated according to the WHO 2010 guidelines reported low RIF C max in all the participants and low EMB C max in 94% of participants (12). In the largest study published to date, we found that a majority of Ghanaian children treated according to the 2014 WHO recommendations achieved C max of INH and PZA on the revised dosages, but 60% of the participants had low RIF or EMB C max (16). In this study, we used the data from our previously published studies (16,17) to develop a model for the population pharmacokinetics of the 4 drugs in children, as well as simulations to predict dosage ranges for each weight band that could achieve desired plasma concentration targets in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, one study among children aged Յ10 years treated according to the WHO 2010 revised dosages reported low 2-hour-postdose concentrations (C-2 h) of RIF, EMB, and PZA in 94%, 85%, and 45% of the children, respectively (13), while another among infants who were treated according to the WHO 2010 guidelines reported low RIF C max in all the participants and low EMB C max in 94% of participants (12). In the largest study published to date, we found that a majority of Ghanaian children treated according to the 2014 WHO recommendations achieved C max of INH and PZA on the revised dosages, but 60% of the participants had low RIF or EMB C max (16). In this study, we used the data from our previously published studies (16,17) to develop a model for the population pharmacokinetics of the 4 drugs in children, as well as simulations to predict dosage ranges for each weight band that could achieve desired plasma concentration targets in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In the largest study published to date, we found that a majority of Ghanaian children treated according to the 2014 WHO recommendations achieved C max of INH and PZA on the revised dosages, but 60% of the participants had low RIF or EMB C max (16). In this study, we used the data from our previously published studies (16,17) to develop a model for the population pharmacokinetics of the 4 drugs in children, as well as simulations to predict dosage ranges for each weight band that could achieve desired plasma concentration targets in children.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Almost all studies investigating ethambutol PK reported lower ethambutol AUC (range: −40% to −60%) and lower ethambutol C max (range: −40% to −70%) in children that were HIV infected compared with uninfected children. 144–146 , 148 , 149 One small study ( n = 18) found low ethambutol C max values regardless of HIV status. 151 Nevertheless, ethambutol exposures generally are substantially lower in HIV-infected children compared with uninfected children.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision dosing algorithms, which account for additional patient and/or disease factors that impact exposure (e.g., HIV infection, SLCO1B1 genotype, and NAT2 acetylator status), will likely be needed to achieve WHO targets with current therapeutics. 20,22,[25][26][27] Optimized FDC formulations were explored based on the individualized doses, but drug doses and dose ratios varied by pharmacokinetic model and isoniazid metabolizing capacity. Our work along with others 16,28 suggests that higher anti-tuberculosis doses and new FDC formulations are needed to ensure optimal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%