2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
213
6
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
213
6
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, patients with cirrhosis are at risk of developing both acute and chronic kidney disease [83][84][85][86][87]. In the general population, chronic renal disease is associated with a high thrombotic risk, while in acute renal failure the bleeding risk prevails over that of thrombosis.…”
Section: Factors Tipping the Hemostatic Balance In Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, patients with cirrhosis are at risk of developing both acute and chronic kidney disease [83][84][85][86][87]. In the general population, chronic renal disease is associated with a high thrombotic risk, while in acute renal failure the bleeding risk prevails over that of thrombosis.…”
Section: Factors Tipping the Hemostatic Balance In Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a peak SCr higher than 1.5 mg/dL was associated with an increase of mortality rate but it was strongly linked with the progression of AKI as well. When this criterion was added to the multivariate model of death prediction, no improvement of the model predictive capacity was seen [23] . Taken together, these studies suggest that using the AKIN classification to detect and assess AKI might have a clinical interest, for example by favouring early recognition of HRS (whereas current diagnostic criteria require a SCr above 1.5 mg/dL) [13] .…”
Section: Definition Of Akimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Piano et al [23] compared the use of "conventional" criteria of AKI diagnosis (i.e., incease of SCr by 50% to a level above 1.5 mg/dL) to the new AKIN criteria in predicting hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients. These authors found that patients with stage 1 AKI did not have higher mortality rate (compared to nonAKI patients), while stage 2 or 3 AKI patients did (however with no differences in mortality between stage 2 and stage 3 patients).…”
Section: Definition Of Akimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum creatinine criteria Urine output criteria 1 Increased creatinine X 1.5 or≥0.3 mg/dL (within 48 h) UO<0.5 ml/kg/hr X 6 h 2 Increased creatinine X 2-3 UO<0.5 ml/kg/hr X12 h 3 Increased creatinine X 3 or Serum creatinine>4mg/dl (with acute rise of ≥0.5 mg/ dl) or renal replacement therapy UO<0.3 ml/kg/hr (oliguria) X 24 h or anuria X 12 h AKIN criteria had been validated both in hospitalized cirrhotic patients and in cirrhotic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (20), in several prospective studies (21)(22)(23). In these studies AKI defined by AKIN criteria was found to be an independent predictor of mortality.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The progression to higher AKI stages were also shown to be related to increased mortality. In the study conducted by Piano et al (21) where they analyzed AKIN criteria to predict in-hospital mortality, the authors concluded that conventional criterion is more accurate than AKIN criteria in the prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. The addition of either the progression of AKIN stage or the cut-off of sCr ≥ 1.5mg/dl to the AKIN criteria improved their prognostic accuracy.…”
Section: Stagementioning
confidence: 99%