2018
DOI: 10.5935/1676-2444.20180053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section in different anatomical sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current research, we observed complete agreement (100% concordance) without any disagreement in the frozen section analysis, mirroring Santana et al's study [ 29 ] where they reported a 99% concordance rate and only 1% disagreement among 101 breast specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our current research, we observed complete agreement (100% concordance) without any disagreement in the frozen section analysis, mirroring Santana et al's study [ 29 ] where they reported a 99% concordance rate and only 1% disagreement among 101 breast specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In these studies, R0 based on frozen section analysis was used for decision-making. However, frozen sections can provide false negative diagnosis and are time-consuming [33,34]. In the current study, we sampled for frozen sections in 36.1% of cases and reached a low sensitivity of 61.1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Em relação aos resultados discordantes, os números encontrados evidenciaram 3,88% do total de casos, uma taxa dentro do esperado, visto que foi notada uma variação entre 2,00% a 6,18% em outras investigações [2][3][4][5][6][7]13,17 . Esses resultados foram compostos em sua maior parte por diagnósticos falso negativos (02,01%) que falso positivos (01,87%), assim como o constatado por Silva RDP et al 2 e Hatami H et al 5 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified