Evaluation of the Accuracy of Smartphone Medical Calculation Apps

Abstract

BackgroundMobile phones with operating systems and capable of running applications (smartphones) are increasingly being used in clinical settings. Medical calculating applications are popular mhealth apps for smartphones. These include, for example, apps that calculate the severity or likelihood of disease-based clinical scoring systems, such as determining the severity of liver disease, the likelihood of having a pulmonary embolism, and risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome. However, the accuracy of these apps has not been assessed.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of smartphone-based medical calculation apps.MethodsA broad search on Google Play, BlackBerry World, and the iTunes App Store was conducted to find medical calculation apps for smartphones. The list of apps was narrowed down based on inclusion and exclusion criteria focusing on functions thought to be relevant by a panel of general internists (number of functions =13). Ten case values were inputted for each function and were compared to manual calculations. For each case, the correct answer was assigned a score of 1. A score for the 10 cases was calculated based on the accuracy of the results for each function on each app.ResultsWe tested 14 apps and 13 functions for each app if that function was available. We conducted 10 cases for each function for a total of 1240 tests. Most functions tested on the apps were accurate in their results with an overall accuracy of 98.6% (17 errors in 1240 tests). In all, 6 of 14 (43%) apps had 100% accuracy. Although 11 of 13 (85%) functions had perfect accuracy, there were issues with 2 functions: the Child-Pugh scores and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores on 8 apps. Approximately half of the errors were clinically significant resulting in a significant change in prognosis (8/17, 47%).ConclusionsThe results suggest that most medical calculating apps provide accurate and reliable results. The free apps that were 100% accurate and contained the most functions desired by internists were CliniCalc, Calculate by QxMD, and Medscape. When using medical calculating apps, the answers will likely be accurate; however, it is important to be careful when calculating MELD scores or Child-Pugh scores on some apps. Despite the few errors found, greater scrutiny is warranted to ensure full accuracy of smartphone medical calculator apps.

Evaluating the impact of the Eastern Academic Health Science Network Transformation Support Unit

“…The evidence they report is inconclusive in terms of the impact on managing demand on professional time, patient experience and health outcomes. Diagnosis apps are found to be not always accurate and interactive symptom checkers may recommend professional care unnecessarily (Semigran et al, 2015, Bierbrier et al, 2014. However, online information appeared to help patients to manage their conditions and have more productive conversations with their GPs.…”

High-tech adjuncts to emergency weight estimation: Point-of-care ultrasound and point-of-care bioelectrical impedance measurements can increase the accuracy of length-based weight estimation in children

“…Apps are already an inextricable part of medical practice, and their use may open the door to adopting more sophisticated and complex methods of predicting weight without a negative effect on medical care [11,31]. An app which could automatically perform the calculations required for a weight estimate as well as drug doses (based on the most appropriate weight-descriptor for drug type and habitus type) could reduce medication errors.…”

“…These systems can eliminate the need for calculations for weight-estimation systems in addition to providing comprehensive drug-dosing information [11]. The use of such devices could also allow for more complex weight estimation methodologies to be used without generating a debilitating cognitive burden.…”

Medical students’ attitudes and wishes towards extending an educational general practice app to be suitable for practice: A cross-sectional survey from Leipzig, Germany

“…[18] Other authors reasoned that with trustworthy and validated apps, health care professionals can be more confident about employing smartphones in a clinical setting. [19] Students' experience We found that the surveyed students would like to use the app in areas where students typically use mobile devices already, in areas that are obviously related to medical education and in those that can be expected to be related to clinical work (e.g. during the final year or when starting postgraduate education).…”