2014
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting

Abstract: ObjectivesEvaluation of the performance of VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) trained nurses to learn colposcopy and the Swede score method to detect cervical lesions by using stationary colposcope or a portable, hand-held colposcope; the Gynocular, as compared to doctors.DesignA crossover randomised clinical trial.SettingThe Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.Participants932 women attending the clinic as either screening naïve for VIA screening (4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nessa et al (14) evaluated cervical lesions in women with abnormal VIA findings using Swede score by Gynocular and colposcope. The cut-off value of 5 and greater for Swede score by the colposcope had a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI, 65.3%-94.7%) and specificity of 24.2% (95% CI, 17.9%-31.5%) Nessa et al (15) evaluated the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and gynocular. Colposcope by doctors had a sensitivity of 83.3%, and specificity of 22% in detecting CIN 2+ lesions at a cut-off ≥ 5 for Swede score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nessa et al (14) evaluated cervical lesions in women with abnormal VIA findings using Swede score by Gynocular and colposcope. The cut-off value of 5 and greater for Swede score by the colposcope had a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI, 65.3%-94.7%) and specificity of 24.2% (95% CI, 17.9%-31.5%) Nessa et al (15) evaluated the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and gynocular. Colposcope by doctors had a sensitivity of 83.3%, and specificity of 22% in detecting CIN 2+ lesions at a cut-off ≥ 5 for Swede score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, the colposcopic procedure followed a positive PAP smear and/or HPV and/or VIA test. Prevalence of CIN2 + in studies assessing the device and colposcopic procedure as a rst-line test was 0.6% [29], and when used in either situation at two points in the screening pathway, a prevalence of 4.2% [31] was found.…”
Section: Table 1 Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Table 1 shows the characteristics of these studies, which include 2693 women. Four of the studies were conducted in LMIC (India [30], Bangladesh [31], Peru [32] and China [29]) and one was conducted in a high-income country (Sweden [33]). All studies used a single-gate design [12].…”
Section: Literature Search Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations