2015
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1079.86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Textural Properties of Peach and Nectarine Through Texture Profile Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The program of the TPA measurement mode was set to a pretest speed of 1 mm•s −1 , a test speed of 1 mm•s −1 , and a posttest speed of 1 mm•s −1 . The compression level was 15% of the original height, the two-compression pause time was 4 s, and the trigger force was 5 g. The parameters obtained from this test result were hardness, springiness, chewiness and resilience (Contador et al, 2016). The puncture test without two compressions used a P/2E 2-mm needle probe to perform a single puncture on the cheek area of the fruit.…”
Section: Measurement Of Texture Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program of the TPA measurement mode was set to a pretest speed of 1 mm•s −1 , a test speed of 1 mm•s −1 , and a posttest speed of 1 mm•s −1 . The compression level was 15% of the original height, the two-compression pause time was 4 s, and the trigger force was 5 g. The parameters obtained from this test result were hardness, springiness, chewiness and resilience (Contador et al, 2016). The puncture test without two compressions used a P/2E 2-mm needle probe to perform a single puncture on the cheek area of the fruit.…”
Section: Measurement Of Texture Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most fruit quality studies in peach have focused on individual quality characteristics such as texture, aroma, color, size, sugar concentration, and acidity (Contador et al, 2015;Crisosto and Crisosto, 2005;Fallahi et al, 2009aFallahi et al, , 2009bVisai and Vanoli, 1997). A collection of observable quality descriptors for individual cultivars is yet to be established for the southeastern United States.…”
Section: P Each In the Southeastern Unitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been tested to determine the sensory texture characteristics of Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb. & Zucc) (Yang et al, 2007), apple (Alvarez et al, 2002;Guine et al, 2011;Mehinagic et al, 2004;Zdunek and Bednarczyk, 2006), grape (Maury et al, 2009;Zouid et al, 2013), pineapple (MonteroCalderon et al, 2010), mango (Al-Haq andSugiyama, 2004), banana (Kajuna et al, 1997), date (Rahman and Al-Farsi, 2005;Singh et al, 2013), pear (Cho et al, 2010), blueberry (Chiabrando et al, 2009), and peach (Contador et al, 2015b). TPA has also been compared with simple compression tests (Fiszman and Damasio, 2000b) on pear (Salvador et al, 2007), mango (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004), pineapple (Montero-Calderon et al, 2010), and blueberry (Li et al, 2011).…”
Section: Rheology Studies On Fruitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TPA has also been compared with simple compression tests (Fiszman and Damasio, 2000b) on pear (Salvador et al, 2007), mango (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004), pineapple (Montero-Calderon et al, 2010), and blueberry (Li et al, 2011). When we are evaluating FFF with different maturity levels within a batch, the second peak of the TPA curve, corresponding to the maximum force of the second compression phase (F2), is quite useful because the variability due to the initial firmness among samples is attenuated; this is because F2 is assessed on the sample that has already been smashed (Contador et al, 2015b). During the ripening phase, four melting fleshed peach cultivars have been observed showing the same F2 slopes (−3.46 N × day −1 ), while nonmelting cultivars ('Carson' and 'Andross') showed a lower F2 slope, reaching −1.79 and −2.36 N × day −1 , respectively (Contador et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Rheology Studies On Fruitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation