Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of text entry methods for Korean mobile phones, a user study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a context similar to Japanese text entry, four popular key layouts for Korean text entry were evaluated on a smartwatch [13]. Three layouts based on a numeric keypad were taken over to smartphones from feature phones [12], and one QWERTY-like Korean keyboard was added as a baseline. That paper concluded that the numeric-keypad-based layouts are viable with a competitive text-entry speed and a reasonable CER.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a context similar to Japanese text entry, four popular key layouts for Korean text entry were evaluated on a smartwatch [13]. Three layouts based on a numeric keypad were taken over to smartphones from feature phones [12], and one QWERTY-like Korean keyboard was added as a baseline. That paper concluded that the numeric-keypad-based layouts are viable with a competitive text-entry speed and a reasonable CER.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3: Indirectly & Partially Translatable such that words required changes to gain similar meaning (for example, "Sam" to "Ram", "spaghetti" to "khichdi"). 4: Not Translatable such that meaning is lost because the phrase contains idioms, colloquial expressions, etc. Second, these raters were asked to rate a Hindi phrase as "Y" if it is a valid Hindi phrase, "N" otherwise.…”
Section: Love Means Many Things)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition was used to make the results more generalizable with the previous studies, and also to provide context for a larger audience to be able to relate the obtained results with English text entry speed; this has been done for Korean text input as well [4]. The average text entry rate over all the sessions across all the participants was 6.91 wpm (sd=2.43) (FP: m=6.22, sd=2.16; TP: m=7.28, sd=2.62; MSP: m=7.22, sd=2.48).…”
Section: Speed and Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%