2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of tensile property of SLA 3D printed NextDent biocompatible Class I material for making surgical guides for implant surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing studies related to the design of support for SLA printing [17][18][19] with materials other than those studied by this research, the studies concluded that support has little effect on tensile strength. However, there is a disadvantage: without support, materials will be saved, but accuracy will decrease compared to cases with support [20][21][22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing studies related to the design of support for SLA printing [17][18][19] with materials other than those studied by this research, the studies concluded that support has little effect on tensile strength. However, there is a disadvantage: without support, materials will be saved, but accuracy will decrease compared to cases with support [20][21][22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLA operation procedure is carried out as follows: In a photopolymer liquid tank, the print tray is submerged in a bath of liquid resin solution a fragile distance from the liquid surface (the tray is covered with a layer of liquid resin). The UV rays shine directly through the UV reflectors on the support tray, curing the liquid layer into a solid forming a precise cross-section of the part [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. After each print layer is solidified, the print tray moves by one step, equal to the thickness of the print layer in the liquid, and the re-sweeping blade distributes the resin upwards in preparation for the formation of a new print layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both SLA and DLP printing methods work by exposing a resin in liquid form to a light source, UV (ultraviolet) laser beam (for SLA) and stationary UV light (for DLP) [11,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]25]. Evaluation of the tensile properties of a certain material is recommended, especially when in vitro studies of their clinical behaviour are limited [27][28][29][30]. According to Chantarapanich, additively printed materials have mechanical properties that can be affected by both the unprinted material properties and the manufacturing method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies investigated the effects of the aging process, building orientation of the layers and preconditioning [10,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Furthermore the resin producer provided information about basic mechanical properties as well [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings demonstrated that mechanical properties strongly depended on resolution, print direction, and UV curing time. Agrawal [15] attempted to determine which orientation angle is best for which kinds of loads, specifically the fracture test and the dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) test. Various mechanical property values were obtained during the inspection process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%