The economic feasibility of CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to offset CO 2 capture costs from a coal-fired power plant are evaluated for thirty-six source-sink scenarios in Ohio; one of the top ten states for fossil fuel use and CO 2 emissions in the United States. Six capture scenarios are examined for a representative 550-megawatt (MW) coal-fired power plant, and three CO 2 -EOR injection scenarios are evaluated for both the East Canton oil field (ECOF) and Gore Consolidated oil field (GCOF). The potential costs and credits associated with CO 2 storage-related tax incentives are also considered. Power plant capture performance and costs integrated with field-scale CO 2 -EOR technoeconomics suggest there are potentially feasible scenarios for capture, transport, and CO 2 -EORstorage of 25%, 50%, and 90% of CO 2 emissions from a 550 MW power plant. Economically feasible outcomes exhibiting net present values (NPV) of $2,191, $1,380, and $1,940 million are estimated for the 25%, 50%, and 90%, capture scenarios, respectively. On average, the 45Q tax credit for CO 2 storage affords a $3 to $7 per barrel decrease in the minimum oil price required to break-even on the project. In all source-sink scenarios qualifying as feasible, the CO 2 capture costs incurred by the power plant are offset by revenue from CO 2 -EOR and are not passed on to ratepayers during the thirty-year analysis time frame. The most economical outcome for supporting a commercial carbon, capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) project in Ohio is also identified, and the potential impact of CO 2 -EOR operational strategy on source-sink feasibility is discussed.