Evaluation of Technology Accessibility and User Sentiment in Learning Through Virtual Reality Modality

Mower, Andrea; Nguyen, Rosalyn; Frank, Kevin

doi:10.1145/3334480.3375205

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Usability Satisfaction 31 [2,8,10,11,17,25,26,31,35,37,45,55,62,66,67,[70][71][72]78,[83][84][85]90,95,98,99,114,115,117,119,120] Efficiency 25 [2, 8, 10, 31, 35, 37, 45-47, 55, 60, 66-68, 75, 83-85, 95, 98, 113-115, 119, 120] Efficacy 23 [2, 8, 10, 23, 24, 31, 36, 37, 45, 55, 56, 62, 66-68, 85, 95, 98, 104, 113, 115, 119, 120] Mental State Subjective 9 [11,23,45,72,81,90,98,99,110] Objective 1 [60] Physical State Subjective 5 [11,47,67,76,98] Objective 4 [4,8,…”

Section: Evaluation Metric N Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hands-free interaction in immersive virtual reality: A systematic review

Monteiro

Gonçalves

Coelho

et al. 2021

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hands are the most important tool to interact with virtual environments, and they should be available to perform the most critical tasks. For example, a surgeon in VR should keep his/her hands on the instruments and be able to do secondary tasks without performing a disruptive event to the operative task. In this common scenario, one can observe that hands are not available for interaction. The goal of this systematic review is to survey the literature and identify which hands-free interfaces are used, the performed interaction tasks, what metrics are used for interface evaluation, and the results of such evaluations. From 80 studies that met the eligibility criteria, the voice is the most studied interface, followed by the eye and head gaze. Some novel interfaces were brain interfaces and face expressions. System control and selection represent most of the interaction tasks studied and most studies evaluate interfaces for usability. Despite the best interface depending on the task and study, the voice was found to be versatile and showed good results amongst the studies. More research is recommended to improve the practical use of the interfaces and to evaluate the interfaces more formally.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Metric N Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hands-free interaction in immersive virtual reality: A systematic review

Monteiro

Gonçalves

Coelho

et al. 2021

IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Technical advances and reduced costs have led to a surge in headmounted display (HMD) based Virtual Reality (VR). While VR was initially confned to labs, there is now a widespread interest among developers to create content for the general public [33] and VR installations can take place in public spaces [44,61] such as pubs and bars, university lounges, ofces, trade shows, conferences, and museums [15,53]. However, due to VR's immersive nature, many public VR installations allow only the user wearing the HMD to beneft from the VR content, excluding everyone else in the public space not wearing an HMD [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing public VR installations:

Greuter

Mueller

Hoang

2022

Designing Interactive Systems Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Virtual Reality (VR) installations using head-mounted displays (HMD) are becoming increasingly popular in public spaces. However, VR's immersive nature engages only the HMD wearer and excludes everyone else in the public space, and there is little design knowledge of how to engage those not wearing an HMD. To address this, we draw from our experiences of having designed seven public VR installations to present a design space around the dimensions of "agency" and "interest" with four user engagement frames to articulate twelve diferent user roles. To guide designers to support all roles and to transition users between those roles, we complement the design space with a set of design tactics for public VR installations. We hope that these combined contributions will help designers engage more people with VR installations so that ultimately more people beneft from what VR has to ofer. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing → Interaction design; Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms.

show abstract