2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of technological properties and selection of wild lactic acid bacteria for starter culture development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“… Galia et al (2009) and Dandoy et al (2011) have highlighted a link between high acidifying activities and the presence of an efficient proteolytic system, whereas our results showed low proteolytic activities and a limited diversity on this criteria in comparison with other studies on the characterization of Streptococcus thermophilus strains ( Urshev et al, 2014 ; Hu et al, 2020 ; Tidona et al, 2020 ) or other species ( Zaaraoui et al, 2021 ; Abarquero et al, 2022 ; Sugajski et al, 2022 ). These findings are in accordance with Harnett et al (2022) , who reported Streptococcus thermophilus as a LAB species generally considered poorly proteolytic.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“… Galia et al (2009) and Dandoy et al (2011) have highlighted a link between high acidifying activities and the presence of an efficient proteolytic system, whereas our results showed low proteolytic activities and a limited diversity on this criteria in comparison with other studies on the characterization of Streptococcus thermophilus strains ( Urshev et al, 2014 ; Hu et al, 2020 ; Tidona et al, 2020 ) or other species ( Zaaraoui et al, 2021 ; Abarquero et al, 2022 ; Sugajski et al, 2022 ). These findings are in accordance with Harnett et al (2022) , who reported Streptococcus thermophilus as a LAB species generally considered poorly proteolytic.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The increasing acidity in the sterile milk over time is thought to result from the breakdown of lactose by LAB to produce the energy required for the synthesis of their constituents and their growth, while producing lactic acid, hence the increase in acidity in the environment. This acidification would consequently lead to a lowering pH of the medium; these observations are in line with data in the literature [2,28]. In the present work, the slight acidification observed after 12 h of incubation can be explained by the significant reduction in the quantity of carbohydrate substrate in the medium, but also by retro-inhibition due to the accumulation of lactic acid [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, the highest concentration of LA (9.343 g/l) obtained in this study after 24 h of incubation is lower than the highest (10.43 g/l) concentration recorded by Alharbi et al, [2] in their work at the same incubation time. This difference could be explained by the fact that the acidifying activity in the milk depends not only on the lactic ferment, but also on its isolation biotope, sampling area and fermentation conditions (initial carbohydrate concentration) [28][29][30]. The growth of LAB isolates is closely linked to their ability to degrade protein (casein) present in the milk as nitrogen source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following LAB strains, selected for their technological and safety characteristics, were included to produce cheese from pasteurised sheep's milk: Lactococcus lactis GE44, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum TAUL67, Lacticaseibacillus paracasei TAUL1752 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides TAUL1342 (Abarquero et al 2023). In addition, a commercial starter culture (KFP R-604; Chr.…”
Section: Lab Strains and Culture Designmentioning
confidence: 99%