2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9me00167k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of techniques for the remediation of antibiotic-contaminated water using activated carbon

Abstract: Antibiotics have emerged as an important group of environmental pollutants and attracted global concern due to their persistent influence on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems even at low concentrations and evolution of antibiotic-resistant superbug.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, physical and chemical activation are the two major types of treatments. The physical activation occurs in the presence of inert gases, O 2 absence or activation by oxidizing agents such as steam, air, CO 2 and their combination, while the chemical activation occurs via carbonization, impregnation with base (KOH, NaOH and Na 2 CO 3 ), alkali metal salt (AlCl 3 and ZnCl 2 ) or acid (H 3 PO 4 and H 2 SO 4 ), and strongly dehydration (Shejale et al, 2020). The activation by using chemical oxidants is performed under mild conditions as compared to physical activation and is created by the chemical-treated activated carbons with higher micro-porosity and larger surface area (Ahmed, 2017).…”
Section: Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, physical and chemical activation are the two major types of treatments. The physical activation occurs in the presence of inert gases, O 2 absence or activation by oxidizing agents such as steam, air, CO 2 and their combination, while the chemical activation occurs via carbonization, impregnation with base (KOH, NaOH and Na 2 CO 3 ), alkali metal salt (AlCl 3 and ZnCl 2 ) or acid (H 3 PO 4 and H 2 SO 4 ), and strongly dehydration (Shejale et al, 2020). The activation by using chemical oxidants is performed under mild conditions as compared to physical activation and is created by the chemical-treated activated carbons with higher micro-porosity and larger surface area (Ahmed, 2017).…”
Section: Activated Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if O 2 is removed, the antibiotic would not interact with the -COO- and -O- groups of the charcoal and would be more effective against P. aeruginosa ( 43 ). More studies are required to fully characterize this interaction, considering previous reports of the capacity of charcoal to remove different types of antibiotics through high adsorption ( 44 ) and charcoal-oxygen-nitrogen interactions ( 43 , 45 ). Another possible explanation could be related to the secondary mechanism of action of polymyxin B, in which an oxidative burst is generated when it interacts with P. aeruginosa ( 46 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomaterials possess unique properties like high specific surface area, high surface to volume ratio, porous nature, active sites, etc., and act as highly efficient material system to selectively remove these contaminants or convert them to less harmful/nontoxic elements. Such nanomaterials like carbonaceous compounds, wide-band semiconductors, various assemblies in 2D, 3D, and membrane structures, etc., always reported excellent performance as compared to the conventional remediation techniques [79]. The composite structures like heterojunctions, various combinations of these nanomaterials, polymers, surface functionalization with other active metal/nanomaterials, etc., make these materials highly active for water remediation and widen their scope to other water contaminants like gases, biological substances, and many more.…”
Section: Removal Of Organic Pollutants: Hydrocarbon Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%