Evaluation of Tall Fescue Pasture under Different Fertilization Treatments¹

Abstract

The influence of fertilizer treatment and growth stage on the composition and nutritive value of tall fescue grazed or fed as cut herbage to sheep was examined in first growth and regrowth pasture. Analysis of clipped herbage showed effects of growth stage and fertilizer treatment on plant content of protein, fiber fractions, soluble carbohydrate and certain macro elements, but little consistent effect on trace minerals. With clipped herbage, fertilizer and growth stage altered dry matter and protein digestibility. Fertilizer had little effect on ad lib. intake; intake declined with advancing maturity in the first growth herbage, but there was no effect of date of cutting on intake in the regrowth trials. The dry matter digestibility of grazed herbage was calculated by use of fecal N as an indicator in “local” regressions. The relationship between digestibility and fecal N was found to be affected by growth phase (first cuttings vs regrowth), but not by fertilizer treatment. Calculated dry matter digestibility coefficients averaged 2% higher for grazed than for clipped herbage. Estimated intake values for grazing sheep indicated that cutting date had no effect on intake within first growth or regrowth trials, but that herbage fertilized with higher levels of nitrogen, or nitrogen plus phosphorus, was consumed in greater amount than nonfertilized grass, or grass treated with phosphorus or potassium alone. Grazing sheep in palatability trials showed a marked preference for fescue fertilized with nitrogen, or nitrogen plus phosphorus. Correlation analyses of nutritive criteria with plant composition showed significant relationships between the dry matter digestibility of clipped or grazed herbage and the content of dry matter, crude protein or fiber fractions, but little apparent effect of most plant components on intake.

Stocking Strategies as Related to Animal and Pasture Productivity of Endophyte‐Free Tall Fescue

“…Steer ADG during the preliminary year (data not shown), but over a shorter time period, were also similar (1.35 kg d −1 for the CS, 1.02 kg d −1 for the DA, and 1.18 kg d −1 for the LR; SE = 0.144). These performance data are in general agreement with Reid et al (1967), Vartha et al (1977), and Burns et al (2011).…”

Tall Fescue Forage Mass and Canopy Characteristics on Steer Ingestive Behavior and Performance

“…Dry matter (DM) was determined by stratum (see below) and used to estimate FM (in kilograms per hectare) at each sampling. Consistent with seeding endophyte‐free seed only slight occurrence of endophyte (mean = 1%) was noted in pastures following 3 yr of grazing (Randall‐Schadel, 1995).…”

‘Grasslands Roa’ tall fescue: Herbage dry matter production and quality under mowing

“…Of the herbage quality factors measured, only the leaf surface characters differed, with S 170 having a considerably higher leaf hair index than Roa (Table 6). Leaf strength, an indicator of fibre content which has been shown to affect herbage intake of tall fescue by sheep (Reid et al 1967), did not differ between Roa and S170, and both cuitivars had lower values than the more 'palatable' Ariki ryegrass. Leaf surface characteristics may be important factors affecting acceptability of herbage to sheep.…”