2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.08131
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of synthetic and experimental training data in supervised machine learning applied to charge state detection of quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation of realistic CSDs requires the consideration of occurring distortions [101], [103], [118]. In the following, we define identified distortion phases, assign collected distortion types to these, and describe their sources, simulation, and the required parameters.…”
Section: Distortions Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation of realistic CSDs requires the consideration of occurring distortions [101], [103], [118]. In the following, we define identified distortion phases, assign collected distortion types to these, and describe their sources, simulation, and the required parameters.…”
Section: Distortions Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[100] studied the effects of involved quantum parameters on CSDs of a serial triple QD and confirmed their global features by the similarity between transport measurements and CIM-based simulations. To detect charge states, [101] evaluated the prediction accuracy of several machine learning models trained on simulated and experimental data. The simulated data are generated from CIM or taken from the Qflow-lite dataset [102], both improved with five different noise types added.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the variability inherent in different QD devices, autotuning naturally benefits from a data-driven approach. Several compelling machine learning strategies have recently been introduced for from-scratch QD tuning [10], coarse tuning into charge regimes [11][12][13][14][15], fine tuning couplings between multiple dots [16,17], or performing autonomous measurements [18,19]. These studies have demonstrated * sczischek@uwaterloo.ca robust effectiveness in identifying electronic states and charge configurations, and automating the precise tuning of gates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black box type approaches to coarse tune plunger, barrier and gate voltages to a DQD regime have been developed [10][11][12][13] , allowing tuning devices using direct current measurements faster than a human expert 14 . Furthermore, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been trained to determine the charge state of the device at a particular set of gate voltages 12,[15][16][17] . To extract the gradients, Hough transforms have been implemented on a DQD stability diagram in a known charge state 18 , allowing to measure the device in virtual voltage space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%