2016
DOI: 10.3109/14397595.2015.1129692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous formulation of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: Caution should be exercised in the high-body-weight subjects, but these data indicate that TCZ-SC maintains the favorable RA disease activity established using TCZ-IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed in the 84-week open-label extension period of the phase III MUSASHI study, as well as in a real-world comparison of DAS28-ESR clinical response in patients at baseline and 3 months after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC [18,19]. TCZ-SC potentially reduced disease activity in TCZ-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were observed in the 84-week open-label extension period of the phase III MUSASHI study, as well as in a real-world comparison of DAS28-ESR clinical response in patients at baseline and 3 months after switching from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC [18,19]. TCZ-SC potentially reduced disease activity in TCZ-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, data from these clinical trials may not fully represent the safety and effectiveness of TCZ-SC in patients in real-world clinical settings. To date, there has been one real-world study that evaluated TCZ effectiveness when switching from IV to SC administration; the investigators found that TCZ-SC maintained a favorable RA disease activity level previously achieved with TCZ-IV [19]. In order to further understand the real-world safety and effectiveness data of TCZ-SC, including patients who may switch from TCZ-IV, the Japanese health authority requested a postmarketing surveillance (PMS) study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in RA show comparable serum trough levels for both TCZ-IV and TCZ-SC [ 17 ], but a higher area under the curve (AUC) for TCZ-IV [ 18 ]. Furthermore, it was shown that the efficacy of TCZ-SC could be worse in patients with high body weight [ 19 ]. Only one of the three patients, who relapsed in our study under TCZ-SC, was obese with a body weight of 100 kg, the two other patients weighed only 61 and 57.5 kg respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 In this study disease control of RA was maintained without serious safety concerns, however it did note that the efficacy may be reduced in patients with heavier body weights. 59 These concerns were reflected in a similar study conducted by Iwamoto et al 60 On the other hand, Burmester et al, following the SUMMACTA study demonstrated comparable long-term efficacy and safety of TCZ SC compared with IV TCZ. 46 Advantages and disadvantages of tocilizumab relative to other products available to treat the same disease A number of biologic monoclonal antibodies targeting different inflammatory cytokines are available to treat RA.…”
Section: Product Availability and Dosing Schedulementioning
confidence: 96%