2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of surface properties of epoxy–nanodiamonds composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nanomechanical test instrument employed in this study is equipped with a SPM (for imaging, a sharp Berkovich diamond indenter of 50nm radius was used), in which a sharp probe tip moves in a raster scan pattern across a sample surface using a three-axis piezo positioner. Details about the instrument and the experimental setup have been presented elsewhere [16]. Prior to indentation, the area function of the indenter tip was calibrated in a fused silica and in a soft PS-6 sheet (E r = 0.007 GPa (7 MPa)) for shallow depths, standard materials for this purpose; getting modulus and hardness values from small (~4-5 nm) indentation depths requires a very careful calibration of the tip.…”
Section: Characterisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nanomechanical test instrument employed in this study is equipped with a SPM (for imaging, a sharp Berkovich diamond indenter of 50nm radius was used), in which a sharp probe tip moves in a raster scan pattern across a sample surface using a three-axis piezo positioner. Details about the instrument and the experimental setup have been presented elsewhere [16]. Prior to indentation, the area function of the indenter tip was calibrated in a fused silica and in a soft PS-6 sheet (E r = 0.007 GPa (7 MPa)) for shallow depths, standard materials for this purpose; getting modulus and hardness values from small (~4-5 nm) indentation depths requires a very careful calibration of the tip.…”
Section: Characterisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to indentation, the area function of the indenter tip was calibrated in a fused silica and in a soft PS-6 sheet (E r = 0.007 GPa (7 MPa)) for shallow depths, standard materials for this purpose; getting modulus and hardness values from small (~4-5 nm) indentation depths requires a very careful calibration of the tip. All nanoindentation tests were conducted in a clean area environment with 45% humidity and 23°C ambient temperature, at 200nm of displacement, with displacement feedback control closed loop [16].…”
Section: Characterisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to applied load is a synergistic phenomenon of increasing stiffness and lubrication [50] (facilitation of fibres network movement under compression) due to pyrolysis process. In Figure 12, the maximum displacement of the carbon fibres at 400 is highest when compared to CF-600 and CF-800, for identical applied load.…”
Section: Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue of nanoindentation measurements is that the material around the contact area tends to (plastically) deform upwards (so-called pile-up) or downwards (so-called sink-in) with respect to the indented surface region. The appearance of such piled-up and sinked-in areas is usually interpreted in terms of the strain-hardening behavior of the indented material [27][28][29][30]. Identification and quantification of the deformation zone around a nanoindentation imprint is of major importance as the shape of the out-of-plane displacement zone is the actual contact area between the tip and the sample.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotube/polyvinyl Butyral Composites (Pvbc)mentioning
confidence: 99%