2007
DOI: 10.1002/app.27687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of surface free energy for PMMA films

Abstract: Surface free energy (SFE) is a property resulted from the chemical structure and the orientation of the molecules at the surface boundary of the materials. For solids, it can be calculated from the contact angles of liquid drops with known surface tension, formed on the solid surface. There are various SFE evaluation methods based on different theoretical assumptions. In this study, SFE and the dispersive, polar, acidic and basic components of the SFE of a polymeric material, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental challenge is underlined by the myriad of different methods that have been proposed to determine the surface energy. These vary from cleavage experiments [24] for brittle materials, the zero-creep method for more ductile materials [30,31], the analysis of the equilibrium shape of crystallites [22,23], or contact angle measurements of liquid droplets [32]; to less direct solutions such as measuring the elastic modulus [33], the electrical conductivity [34], or even the speed of acoustic waves [35] in submicrometer powder assemblies. These experiments often suffer from a low precision and inaccuracies due to surface contaminants, but more importantly from a benchmark point of view, each method is biased towards a certain class of materials.…”
Section: A Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental challenge is underlined by the myriad of different methods that have been proposed to determine the surface energy. These vary from cleavage experiments [24] for brittle materials, the zero-creep method for more ductile materials [30,31], the analysis of the equilibrium shape of crystallites [22,23], or contact angle measurements of liquid droplets [32]; to less direct solutions such as measuring the elastic modulus [33], the electrical conductivity [34], or even the speed of acoustic waves [35] in submicrometer powder assemblies. These experiments often suffer from a low precision and inaccuracies due to surface contaminants, but more importantly from a benchmark point of view, each method is biased towards a certain class of materials.…”
Section: A Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It exhibits high resistivity (> 2·10 15 Ω·cm) and low dielectric constant (ε = 2.6 at 1 MHz, ε = 3.9 at 60 Hz), good dielectric strength (17.7 -60 kV/mm), and a low dissipation factor (0.013 -0.015). The surface tension of PMMA is ~39 mJ/m² at 25 °C [26][27][28], an important aspect for understanding interfacial phenomena. In multilayered structures, PMMA films can be made by spin coating, but also by pulsed laser deposition and matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation [29][30][31], depending on the final structures that are intended to be grown.…”
Section: Page 3 Of 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deionized water and methylene iodide were used as test liquids and the surface energies were derived by using the Young-GoodGirifalco-Fowkes equation [24]. Grazing angle infrared spectra (GIR) were acquired using a Tensor 27 FTIR spectrometer equipped with a microscope Hyperion 2000 with grazing angle objective (Bruker Optics) and a liquid nitrogen cooled MCT detector.…”
Section: Surface Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%