2016
DOI: 10.1177/1040638716657377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of supervised machine-learning algorithms to distinguish between inflammatory bowel disease and alimentary lymphoma in cats

Abstract: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and alimentary lymphoma (ALA) are common gastrointestinal diseases in cats. The very similar clinical signs and histopathologic features of these diseases make the distinction between them diagnostically challenging. We tested the use of supervised machine-learning algorithms to differentiate between the 2 diseases using data generated from noninvasive diagnostic tests. Three prediction models were developed using 3 machine-learning algorithms: naive Bayes, decision trees, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that a deep learning object detection algorithm successfully recognized and identified intestinal parasite eggs of dogs and cats on fecal flotation slides scanned by an automated microscope. The utilization of machine learning systems to support veterinarians with decision and diagnosis making processes has been evaluated previously [12][13][14][15][16][17]; however, it has been very limited in veterinary medicine compared to that in human medicine [18]. The algorithms evaluated in previous studies were mainly systems that assisted the medical decision-making processes based on results obtained from physical examinations and laboratory tests [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that a deep learning object detection algorithm successfully recognized and identified intestinal parasite eggs of dogs and cats on fecal flotation slides scanned by an automated microscope. The utilization of machine learning systems to support veterinarians with decision and diagnosis making processes has been evaluated previously [12][13][14][15][16][17]; however, it has been very limited in veterinary medicine compared to that in human medicine [18]. The algorithms evaluated in previous studies were mainly systems that assisted the medical decision-making processes based on results obtained from physical examinations and laboratory tests [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of machine learning systems to support veterinarians with decision and diagnosis making processes has been evaluated previously [12][13][14][15][16][17]; however, it has been very limited in veterinary medicine compared to that in human medicine [18]. The algorithms evaluated in previous studies were mainly systems that assisted the medical decision-making processes based on results obtained from physical examinations and laboratory tests [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Additionally, a computational shape recognition system integrated with fluorescent lebelling and smartphonebased image capturing has been assessed and applied for parasite fecal egg counting examinations [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Identifying melena and or hematochezia in our feline patients is equally valid; the type of gastrointestinal diseases resulting in gastrointestinal bleeding, such as inflammatory bowel disease and neoplasia, may vary in severity, location and presentation, and may result in both melena and hematochezia. [22][23][24] Differences in FOB sensitivity based on the location of gastrointestinal bleeding may occur as a result of the presence of bacteria and digestive enzymes, which degrade hemoglobin. Administering incremental volumes of whole blood directly to stool samples, we were able to assess test sensitivity for varying levels of hematochezia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomarkers include albumin, cobalamin, folate, total protein, lactate dehydrogenase, thymidine kinase type 1, serum amyloid A and fecal calprotectin, among others. 2,7,911 None has been able to replace the need for histopathologic evaluation of biopsied tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%