2006
DOI: 10.1577/a05-096.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Substrate Type and Density as Factors in Optimizing Growth of Least Chub

Abstract: The least chub Iotichthys phlegethontis is a diminutive and rare cyprinid endemic to the Bonneville Basin of Utah. As part of a species recovery effort, aquaculture techniques were investigated. Three experiments are summarized here: two compared silt substrate and no substrate, and one evaluated the effect of three different densities on growth and survival. The substrate experiments were an attempt to compare extensive versus intensive culture. In the first test, growth of 4-7-month-old least chub in outdoor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found no significant difference in growth or survival in the density range we examined. Our highest density, 3,400 fish/m 3 , was still well below or within previously recommended densities for other cyprinid species in intensive aquaculture (Hepher and Pruginin 1981;Horváth et al 1992;Wagner et al 2006), but the above densities were typically recommended for pond-reared cyprinids relying on natural foods (Stickney 1979;Horváth et al 1992;Feldlite and Milstein 2000).…”
Section: Juvenile Rearing Densitysupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found no significant difference in growth or survival in the density range we examined. Our highest density, 3,400 fish/m 3 , was still well below or within previously recommended densities for other cyprinid species in intensive aquaculture (Hepher and Pruginin 1981;Horváth et al 1992;Wagner et al 2006), but the above densities were typically recommended for pond-reared cyprinids relying on natural foods (Stickney 1979;Horváth et al 1992;Feldlite and Milstein 2000).…”
Section: Juvenile Rearing Densitysupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Although the upper limit for juvenile northern leatherside chub rearing density has yet to be determined, densities of at least 3,400/m 3 can be used for intensive aquaculture without compromising growth and survival. As seen with the least chub Iotichthys phlegethontis (Wagner et al 2006), leatherside chub tend to be a schooling species; therefore, high densities are possible. The glass aquaria used for our study were adequate rearing environments for the densities we examined.…”
Section: Juvenile Rearing Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reintroduction is becoming an important tool in efforts to manage native fish (Archdeacon and Bonar 2009), creating a need to develop and maintain refuge populations as sources for rare fishes (Wagner et al 2006). Despite the potential importance of captive propagation to management and conservation actions (Schultz and Bonar 2009), little is known about culture for most threatened or endangered fishes, especially compared with sport and baitfish species (Kline and Bonar 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%