2011
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery conformity indices for 170 target volumes in patients with brain metastases

Abstract: A database of clinically approved stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans was created. One hundred and seventy targets in the database were then retrospectively evaluated using conformity indices suggested by RTOG, SALT‐Lomax and Paddick. Relationships between the three alternative conformity indices were determined. The Paddick index combines the information provided by the RTOG and SALT‐Lomax indices into a single index. The variation in the geometric overlap ratio, which is related to the SALT‐Lomax index… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The established values for normal tissue dose were based on the healthy tissue overdosage factor (HTOF) of Salt (12,(16)(17)(18). The conformity index (CI) and the homogeneity index (HI) values for the target volume were calculated according to the following formulae (13,17,(19)(20)(21): i) CI RTOG = V RI / TV; where the volume of the reference isodose (V RI ) is the volume of the PTV receiving a 95% reference/planned dose, and the target volume (TV) is the volume of the PTV. ii) HI = I max / RI; where I max is the maximum dose to the target, and RI is the reference dose in the PTV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The established values for normal tissue dose were based on the healthy tissue overdosage factor (HTOF) of Salt (12,(16)(17)(18). The conformity index (CI) and the homogeneity index (HI) values for the target volume were calculated according to the following formulae (13,17,(19)(20)(21): i) CI RTOG = V RI / TV; where the volume of the reference isodose (V RI ) is the volume of the PTV receiving a 95% reference/planned dose, and the target volume (TV) is the volume of the PTV. ii) HI = I max / RI; where I max is the maximum dose to the target, and RI is the reference dose in the PTV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CI RTOG is defined as the volume covered by the prescription isodose divided by the total target tumor volume. 45 Mathematically, perfect overlap between the targeted volume and total tumor volume would correspond to a CI value of 1.0. On the other hand, decreasing the volume of coverage or increasing the lesion volume would result in a lower CI value.…”
Section: Adverse Radiation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocol compliance is defined as HI RTOG ≤ 2.0, with a HI RTOG between 2.0 and 2.5 defined as minor and HI RTOG > 2.5 as major deviations. 11,12 Q RTOG evaluates how well the required dose covers the target and is defined as…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is inversely related to the RTOG conformity index. 12,13,15 An ideal plan would result in a CI Paddick of 1.0, with a conformity index of ≥ 0.6 considered acceptable. 16 The Paddick gradient index (GI Paddick ) attempts to reflect how fast the dose falls off beyond the target in trying to spare normal tissue and critical structures.…”
Section: 12mentioning
confidence: 99%