Electron Microscopy in Forensic, Occupational, and Environmental Health Sciences 1986
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-5245-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Staple Impressions in the Scanning Electron Microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identified constituents were then rated as to whether it was "common" (consistently found throughout the sample) or "present" (detected but infrequently) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). This designation does not necessarily indicate the relative abundance of a constituent by weight or volume within a sample; it is an indictor of numerical abundance of a constituent.…”
Section: Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identified constituents were then rated as to whether it was "common" (consistently found throughout the sample) or "present" (detected but infrequently) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). This designation does not necessarily indicate the relative abundance of a constituent by weight or volume within a sample; it is an indictor of numerical abundance of a constituent.…”
Section: Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%